Judges Act—Criminal Code
Bill to Amend--Second Reading--Debate
February 9, 2021
We are ready for the question.
Your Honour, I would like to move the adjournment of the debate of this, please.
It is moved by the Honourable Senator Plett, seconded by the Honourable Senator Martin, that further debate be adjourned to the next sitting of the Senate. If you are opposed to the motion, please say, “nay.”
If you agree to the motion, please say, “yea.”
I believe the “yeas” have it.
Will you ask the question again, please?
I think it was pretty clear, Your Honour. We can’t ask for you to repeat it.
It was moved by the Honourable Senator Plett and seconded by the Honourable Senator Martin that the debate be adjourned. If you are opposed, say “no.”
Those in favour of the motion in the Senate chamber, please say “yea.”
Those opposed in the Senate chamber say “nay.”
I believe the “yeas” have it.
Two senators indicate they wish a standing vote. Do we have a bell?
Six minutes.
No.
Let’s have some sanity. I would rather move the adjournment of the Senate.
It is an hour bell because there is no agreement. Is it agreed for a six-minute bell?
The vote will occur at 8:59. Call in the senators.
The Hon. the Speaker pro tempore: Honourable senators, the question is as follows: It was moved by the Honourable Senator Plett, seconded by the Honourable Senator Martin, that further debate be adjourned to the next sitting of the Senate.
I’d like to explain why I abstained.
I know that many Canadians are currently watching and have been able to appreciate the gravity of the questions and arguments that have been debated in this chamber over the course of the day and since yesterday. However, I’m sad that this evening is ending on a partisan note, and that is why I refused to vote and participate in what I feel is a regrettable end-of-day proceeding. Thank you.