CLIMATE CHANGE: WE ARE AT RISK
Standing Senate Committee on Agriculture and Forestry
INTERIM
REPORT
The Honourable Donald Oliver, Q.C.,Chair
The
Honourable John Wiebe, Deputy Chair
June 2003
MEMBERSHIP
THE
STANDING SENATE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE AND
FORESTRY
The
Honourable Senators
Liberals *Sharon Carstairs, P.C. (or Robichaud, P.C.) |
Conservatives Leonard
Gustafson |
(*Ex
officio members)
Acting
Clerk of the Committee
Keli
Hogan
Analysts
from the Research Branch, Library of Parliament
Frédéric Forge
Lorie Srivastava
Jean-Luc Bourdages
Note:
The Honourable Senators Raynell Andreychuk; Pat Carney; Jane Cordy;
Marisa Ferretti Barth; Joan Fraser; Jean Lapointe; Shirley Maheu; Frank
Mahovlich; Lorna Milne; Wilfred P. Moore and David P. Smith also served on the
Committee.
ORDER
OF REFERENCE
Extract
of the Journals of the Senate,
Thursday, October 31, 2002:
The
Honourable Senator Wiebe moved, seconded by the Honourable Senator Chalifoux:
That the
Standing Senate Committee on Agriculture and Forestry be authorized to examine
the impact of climate change on Canada’s agriculture, forests and rural
communities and the potential adaptation options focusing on primary
production, practices, technologies, ecosystems and other related areas;
That the
papers and evidence received and taken on the subject and the work
accomplished by the Standing Senate Committee on Agriculture and Forestry
during the First Session of the Thirty-Seventh Parliament be referred to the
Committee and;
That the
Committee submit its final report no later than December 31, 2003.
The question being put on the motion, it was adopted.
Paul
C. Bélisle
Clerk
of the Senate
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
The Saguenay Flood of 1996
The Red River Flood of 1997
The Ice Storm of 1998
Droughts Since 1999
What is Climate?
Why is Climate Change Important?
Focus on Adaptation
CHAPTER 2: BACKGROUND ON CLIMATE CHANGE
A. Our Climate is Changing
B. …And the Changes Will Affect Us
C. The Solution is to Reduce Emissions…
1. The Kyoto Protocol
2. The Emissions Trading System
3. The Decarbonization of Global Energy Systems
D. ….And Adapt to the Effects
Summary
CHAPTER 3: EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON AGRICULTURE:
WHAT DO WE KNOW?
A. Biophysical Effects of Climate Change on Canadian Agriculture
B. Economics Effects of Climate Change on Canadian Agriculture
C. Adaptation Options for Agriculture
Summary
CHAPTER 4: EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON FORESTS:
WHAT DO WE KNOW?
A. Biophysical Effects of Climate Change on Canada's Forests
B. Adaptation Options for Forestry
Summary
CHAPTER 5: EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON WATER
A. Effects of Climate Change on Water Resources
B. Water Stresses on Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Communities
C. Adaptation Strategies For Water Resources
Summary
CHAPTER 6: EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON RURAL COMMUNITIES
Summary
CHAPTER 7: EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON ABORIGINAL PEOPLE
Summary
CHAPTER 8: WHAT DO WE NEED TO DO TO ADAPT?
A. Research
1. The Need for Integrated Research
2. Areas of Research
3. Fostering Research
Summary
B. Communication
1. A Clear Message at the Right Time
2. A National Communication Strategy
Summary
C. Government Policies and Programs
1. Specific programs to Encourage Adaptation
2. Incorporation Climate Change into Existing Programs and Policies
Summary
CHAPTER 9: CONCLUSION - LESSONS LEARNED
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
LIST
OF ABBREVIATIONS
AAFC
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
APF
Agriculture Policy Framework
C-CIARN
Canadian Climate Change Impact and Adaptation Research Network
CCAF
Climate Change Action Fund
CCPC
Climate Change Plan for Canada
CFA
Canadian Federation of Agriculture
CFS
Canadian Forest Service
CO2
Carbon dioxide
GHG
Greenhouse gas
IPCC
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
N20
Nitrous oxide
PFRA
Prairie Farm Rehabilitation Administration
From November 2002 to May 2003, the Senate Standing Committee on
Agriculture and Forestry examined the effects of climate change on Canada’s
agricultural and forestry sectors and rural communities. This study is a
direct result of the Committee’s previous study, Canadian Farmers at Risk.[1]
As part of that study, the Committee travelled to the Maritimes to hear from
farmers about their concerns. Farmers repeatedly expressed apprehension about
changes in climate and were unsure as to how they could cope with – or adapt
to – apparently new climate scenarios.
After identifying the leading researchers in the field of climate change
and adaptation in Canada and abroad, the Committee heard from witnesses at the
forefront in this area from universities, research centres, and governments
across Canada as well as internationally. The Committee took a country-wide
approach and actively sought the views of farmer organizations, rural
associations, ecotourism groups, and environmental and conservation
organizations from all regions of Canada. The Committee held hearings in
Ottawa and travelled to Saskatchewan, Alberta, and British Columbia (see the
Appendix for a complete list of witnesses). Throughout the hearings, the
Committee was especially interested in learning about effective adaptation
strategies for Canadians.
Farmers, forest operators and rural communities are already facing and
adapting to a wide range of risks and opportunities that arise from changes in
market conditions, domestic regulations, trade policies, technology, and other
factors. This study thus extends
the work presented in the Committee’s last report, Canadian Farmers at
Risk, which examined short- and long-term issues affecting the health of
Canada’s agricultural and agri-food industry.
This interim report expresses the views and concerns of the various
witnesses. The Committee will
release a final report in October 2003. That
report will provide specific recommendations to help ensure that Canada
successfully responds and adapts to climate change, thereby assuring the
continued prosperity of our agriculture and forestry sectors and our rural
communities.
Chapter
1: Introduction
The
Saguenay flood of 1996, the Red River flood of 1997, and the 1998 ice storm
dominated the lives of several million Canadians and resulted in unprecedented
numbers of weather-related insurance claims. Weather
affects our daily lives, sometimes dramatically, as illustrated by these
recent extreme weather events. Climate is different from weather: climate
refers to average meteorological conditions – temperature,
precipitation, and wind patterns, amongst other variables. But climate, too,
can change, although the changes are apparent only over long periods of time.
Historically,
changes in climate have occurred at a slow enough pace that humanity has been
able to adapt to them without major disruptions. There is strong evidence,
however, that climate change will accelerate during the coming century at
rates beyond our historical ability to adapt.
The predicted impacts will include not only more frequent extreme weather
events, but also long-term environmental shifts that will profoundly affect
economies and lifestyles around the world.
For example, the main effect of climate change is likely to be on
Canada’s water resources.
During the course of its last study, the Senate Standing Committee on Agriculture and Forestry heard much evidence from farmers across Canada about the 2001 drought, and how badly it had affected them. How will Canadians cope if such droughts occur more frequently in areas where before they were exceptional incidents? From November 2002 to May 2003, the Committee studied the effects of climate change on Canada’s agriculture, forests, and rural communities, with an emphasis on how these can best adapt to a changing climate. This summary highlights the Committee’s findings. The overview of chapter 2 provides some background on the issue of climate change, while the overviews of chapters 3 to 7 summarize the research and evidence gathered by the Committee on the potential effects of climate change on agriculture, forests, water, rural communities and Aboriginal people. Chapter 8 identifies areas for government action to help rural Canada in its adaptation efforts.
Chapter
2: Background on Climate Change
The
Committee was presented with evidence that shows our climate is, indeed,
changing. One of the main indicators is the global trend of warming
temperatures. Much of the scientific evidence was very technical, but it is
included in this chapter since it provides important background for later
chapters and recommendations:
·
It is
accepted that the average surface temperature of the globe has increased about
0.6oC in the past 100 years, over sea and land.
·
None of the
natural factors affecting climate provides an obvious explanation for this
observed global warming.
·
By now there
is sufficient scientific evidence to suggest that the warming trend of the
earth observed in the last century is caused by human-induced emissions of
greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide (CO2).
·
This warming
trend is likely to continue at a rate unprecedented in human history, and it
will have consequences at the regional level on temperature, precipitation
patterns and, more importantly, the frequency of extreme weather events.
·
Because the
warming effect will be amplified closer to the poles, countries such
as Canada will be
more vulnerable. In fact, some effects are already being felt in the northern
part of the country.
There
are actions that Canada and other countries can take to slow this change.
Essentially, we need to reduce our emissions of greenhouse gases, such
as CO2:
·
The Kyoto
Protocol binds industrial countries to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.
Experts agree, however, that the implementation of the Protocol will not, by
itself, curb – let alone reverse – the warming trend.
·
The use of
forests and agricultural soils to remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere
will only be a temporary measure to help Canada meet its Kyoto commitment; it
will have little effect on the overall amount of greenhouse gases in the
atmosphere.
·
Stabilization
of greenhouse gases at levels that avoid dangerous consequences for humanity
will entail drastic measures far beyond those required for the Protocol.
Hydrogen must become the fuel of the future, replacing fuels such as oil that
are associated with emissions of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. This
transition could be made possible by investing in nuclear and renewable
sources of energy.
Experts
also agree that the climate will take time to respond to the changing
quantities of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. By the time we have
significantly reduced greenhouse gas emissions, the climate will already have
warmed and we will have had no choice but to adapt to new climatic conditions:
·
Aside from
some initiatives such as Canada’s Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation
Program, which funds research, and the Canadian Climate Impacts and Adaptation
Research Network (C-CIARN), only limited resources have been allocated to
adaptation to climate change.
·
There is a
need for a long-term commitment to support, fund and monitor progress toward
adaptation, and the Government of Canada should take a leadership role on this
issue.
General Remarks on Chapters 3, 4 and 5
The Committee received evidence from many researchers – climatologists, soil scientists, resource economists, biologists, entomologists, and others – who provided detailed information about their work on the potential effects of climate change on agriculture, forestry, and water resources, as well as their studies of potential adaptation options. Chapters 3, 4 and 5 focus on the state of knowledge about the potential effects of climate change on these three resources. In order to put the findings into perspective, the following points should be noted:
·
Most of the
research on the effects of climate change on agriculture, forests, and water
resources uses models designed to study the planet as a whole. Model
developers told the Committee that such models are too broad to give an
accurate assessment of future implications at a regional level.
·
Researchers
involved in the field of impact and adaptation, however, believe that these
models can, indeed, yield some useful results at a smaller scale; but they
agree that it remains a challenge to try to downscale
findings to local levels.
·
Results from
these studies provide scenarios of plausible future events.
They are by no means forecasts of what climate change will bring.
·
The coverage of these studies has been somewhat
piecemeal; they do not address the entire diversity of our country.
In
light of the above-mentioned remarks, it is important that we try to develop
greater accuracy and confidence regarding what will happen, and where. It is
equally important that we first determine where Canada’s agriculture
industry and our forest industry are vulnerable, in order to be able to
improve their resilience.
Chapter 3: Agriculture
Changes
in climatic conditions will affect agriculture in three different ways:
·
Changes in
average climatic conditions will modify Canada’s agricultural map.
It is generally accepted that higher temperatures, and enhanced CO2
in the atmosphere, will enable better yields, new crops and a northward
extension of agricultural land. Locally,
however, these benefits might be offset by a number of factors, including
reduced water availability, limited soil availability in the north, increased
soil erosion if droughts and floods become more frequent, increased insect
outbreaks, and more vigorous weeds.
·
All witnesses
agreed that changes in the year to year variation in temperature and
precipitation will be far more significant for the agricultural sector than
changes in the average conditions. We
can expect that climate change will alter the frequency of anomalous years;
that is, some extreme conditions will become less frequent, while others will
become more frequent. It was
mentioned many times that Canada can expect more frequent and widespread
droughts, particularly in the Prairies.
·
The impact of
climate change on the rest of the world will also have implications for
Canada’s agricultural sector. Many
prices are determined by world markets, meaning that the economic effect on
this sector in Canada will depend also on how Canadian productivity may change
relative to that of other countries.
Farmers
are already innovative and adapt to various stresses, including variations in
weather, trade policies, and commodity prices.
Historically, a range of adaptation options has been available to
farmers to cope with various risks and conditions, and these options will
continue to help them in the future. They are:
·
technological
development, including the development of new crop varieties;
·
farm
financial management, including crop insurance;
·
farm
production practices, including diversification and irrigation; and
·
government
programs, including support programs and taxation.
Technological
development and improvements in agricultural practices will have an important
role in enabling adaptation to climate change.
But it is crucial that farmers also improve their capacity to deal with
the risks that currently exist, in order to enhance their ability to deal with
future risk, including those associated with climate change.
Farmers will have to build on their strengths and identify where their
farm operations are vulnerable.
Chapter 4: Forests
Climate
change is also likely to affect Canada’s forests in different ways:
·
Researchers
are not certain whether Canadian forests will experience increased or
decreased productivity as a result of climate change.
On one hand, a longer growing season and increased CO2 in
the atmosphere will encourage tree growth.
On the other hand, increased damage to forests and trees is expected
due to winter thaws and extreme weather events (violent winds, for instance),
and greater risk of forest fires and insect outbreaks such as the Mountain
pine beetle in British Columbia.
·
Researchers
also expect to see the temperate forests and the boreal forest move northward
as a result of increased temperatures. A number of factors will limit this
migration, however, and Canada could potentially lose species and end up with
weedy and less vigorous forests.
·
Such impacts of climate change
on forests are likely to affect Canadian society and the economy. For
instance, socio-economic effects may include changes in timber supply and rent
value, changes in land values, loss of forest for recreation, and dislocation
of parks and natural areas.
The
effects of climate change on forests will require appropriate anticipatory
adaptation from the forest sector. Notwithstanding
the uncertainty about the impact of climate change on forest ecosystems over
the next decades, several witnesses urged that the Canadian forest industry
rapidly apply current knowledge on forest fires, insects and diseases in its
long-term planning of forest operations. Current knowledge on forest fires,
for example, can be used to plan for harvesting rotation.
It
was also stressed that the uncertain impact of climate change on the Canadian
forest industry and on the rural communities that depend on healthy forests
for their well-being may represent a good opportunity for all forestry
stakeholders to undertake a profound reflection about forest management of the
future.
Chapter 5: Water
The
main effect of climate change is likely to be on Canada’s water resources.
While predictions of how precipitation
regimes will change are very uncertain, evidence is consistent on the
following points:
·
We can expect
more variability in precipitation: there will be years that are wetter than
normal, but there will be other years that are much drier than normal.
Storms and droughts may occur more often.
·
Adaptation
measures will mainly concern engineering and infrastructure – irrigation,
water treatment plants, etc. – but also technology to improve water use
efficiency. Those measures will
vary locally and will depend on the users – agriculture, forestry, tourism,
etc.
·
Given the demands for water by agriculture, the forest
industry, and households in rural and urban areas, the evidence indicates that
water-use conflicts will increase.
·
If water-use
conflicts increase, decision-makers will have to determine what uses are
appropriate and inappropriate, and where the available water is best
allocated.
Chapter 6: Rural Communities
Rural
Canada is an important contributor to the country’s wealth, supplying 15% of
the Gross Domestic Product and 40% of Canadian exports. Because it relies
largely on natural resource-based industries, rural Canada will be more
vulnerable to climate change. The
following points arose from the hearings:
·
Over the past
several decades, the population and composition of rural communities in Canada
have been changing dramatically, due to migration and structural
transformations in agriculture and other resource-based industries.
In 2000, for example, off-farm income represented 56% of the total farm
income.
·
The
livelihoods of rural Canadians are already stressed by low commodity prices
and by trade conflicts such as the softwood lumber dispute, among other
things.
·
Climate
change will bring additional stresses, which may aggravate those already
affecting rural Canada.
·
Climate
change will have significant financial and economic repercussions on natural
resource-based industries. If the
financial basis of farming, forestry, and other natural resource-based
industries is threatened, so is the viability of rural communities.
·
Physical
infrastructure in some communities will also be challenged by rising sea
levels and increased weather-related damage.
·
Social
cohesion will be threatened if, among other things, water use conflicts
increase.
·
In order to
cope with these changes, rural communities will have to start considering
climate change in their planning. A
starting point could be to raise their awareness of this issue, notably
through participation in C-CIARN workshops. This stresses the importance of a communication strategy on
climate change (chapter 8).
Chapter 7: Aboriginal People
The
Committee met with elected representatives from the Metis Nation of Alberta
and the Kainai Nation. Representatives from C-CIARN North also provided
insights into the situation of the Inuit. The following points were
highlighted:
·
The knowledge
and life experience of the elders have produced observations that are closely
linked with recent scientific findings on the trend of climate change.
·
Indigenous
peoples of the North are more sensitive to climate change than
non‑indigenous peoples, because their homelands, culture, traditional
knowledge, and hunting habitats will be directly affected.
·
Partnerships
among scientists, aboriginal Nations, and northern communities have increased
in the past two decades, notably in regions where scientific research has been
focused.
·
Aboriginal
people need better access to programs that would help them adapt to climate
change.
·
As Aboriginal
people achieve rights to the management of resources and land ownership, their
organizations are seeking a more meaningful role in research, outreach action,
and international negotiations on climate change.
Chapter 8: What Do We Need to Do to Adapt?
While
it is still too early to clearly identify effective adaptation measures that
should be taken, there is room for government action. This chapter presents
and discusses three areas for proactive action on climate change: research,
communication, and government programs.
Research
While
research on adaptation to climate change is still in its infancy, Canada is at
the forefront and Canadian researchers are leading numerous international
activities on this issue. Such
research, however, suffers from the following problems:
·
a lack of
funding, relative to the funding allocated to the reduction of greenhouse gas
emissions;
·
a lack of
suitably qualified graduate students; and
·
difficulty in
securing funding for research that involves many different disciplines.
Witnesses
suggested various approaches to fostering research:
·
enhance
government research capacity;
·
facilitate
partnerships between research organizations;
·
create
research chairs on adaptation, and graduate student awards; and
·
create a
central facility to bring together researchers from various disciplines.
Communication
Scientific
information is complex by nature, and effective communication has been a
common concern at all the public hearings. Three main points emerged from the
hearings:
·
It is
important not to sensationalize the issue and needlessly scare the public;
nevertheless, the Committee would be remiss if it were to ignore the clear
message from witnesses that Canada is soon likely to face much greater changes
than it has experienced in the last hundred years.
·
In addition
to the conventional view that information must flow from researchers to the
industries and communities, it is equally important that the research
community learn from producers, the rural population, and Aboriginal people.
As a relatively new entity, C-CIARN is beginning to initiate such two-way
discussions between researchers and stakeholders.
·
A single,
monolithic communications plan may not be appropriate to reach rural Canada.
Any communications strategy should use existing networks within rural
communities to ensure that current information is effectively distributed.
The capacity for extension services to deliver information to producers
and woodlot owners has been severely curtailed over the last 20 to 30 years,
and should be restored.
·
The access to
broadband technology is also essential to rural communities to enable rural
Canadians to actively search the information by themselves.
Government Programs
Current
public policies such as taxation, farm programs, and provincial regulations on
forest practices may either hinder or encourage adaptation efforts. In order
to create a favourable environment that allows farmers and forest operators to
adapt, governments should consider the following points:
·
To adapt
proactively to climate change, the agriculture and forest industries may
require longer-term incentives that would counter the short-term ones provided
by markets.
·
A general
goal of government policies should be to encourage the adoption of
opportunities to adapt to climate change, or at the very least to avoid
preventing the adoption of such opportunities. Therefore, climate change
considerations should be incorporated into Canadian agricultural policy,
forest management legislation, certification standards for environmentally
friendly products, and other policies that are relevant to the well-being of
rural communities. In doing this,
we will make our industries, ecosystems, and communities less vulnerable to
climatic changes, while also helping them to adapt to other stresses.
[1]
Canadian
Farmers At Risk,
Report of the Standing Senate Committee on Agriculture and Forestry. June
2002. 1st Session, 37th Parliament. Available at
/en/Content/SEN/Committee/371/agri/rep/rep10jun02-e.htm.
The Saguenay Flood of 1996
The
Saguenay Flood was Canada’s first $1-billion disaster. Torrential rains over
Quebec’s Saguenay region during 19-21 July led to flooding and mudslides
that destroyed parts of Chicoutimi, Jonquière, La Baie, Ferland, and
Boilleau. In a few hours, the area around La Baie, Bagotville, and Jonquière
was transformed into a soup of mud. Several people died and 10,000 had to flee
their homes. There were 16,000 victims in total. Most local power and about
8,000 land-line telephones were cut off, creating a widespread emergency
situation.
The Red River Flood of 1997
The Canadian portion of the Red River crested at Winnipeg early on May 4, causing the worst flooding the region had seen since 1852. With more than 256,000 hectares under water across southern Manitoba and the Dakotas, about 75,000 people were forced to abandon their homes. The river turned into a huge lake, nicknamed the Red Sea, which covered 1,840 square kilometres. The eight-week ordeal caused $450 million in damage. It is estimated that damage would have exceeded $6 billion without the Red River Floodway, constructed in the 1960s to divert floodwaters around Winnipeg.
The Ice Storm of 1998
The
ice storm dominated lives and landscapes in huge areas of eastern Canada
during January 1998. It affected five million people – about 17 per cent of
Canada’s population – and stretched a distance of more than 1,000
kilometres, from Georgian Bay to the Bay of Fundy. Eastern Ontario and Quebec
were pelted by freezing rain that clung to trees, power lines and transmission
towers for six days. Thirty-five people died, and millions of trees were
destroyed. More than a million people in Quebec and about 100,000 in Ontario
were left without power for days. Insurance claim payouts approached $1.44
billion, three times the amount paid out for any other natural disaster in
Canada; total costs were estimated at $2.5 billion.
The
Saguenay flood of 1996, the Red River flood of 1997, and the 1998 ice storm
resulted in the highest number of weather-related insurance claims ever made
in Canada. Before 1998, Canadian insurers had never paid out more than $500
million for natural disaster claims in any year. Costs related to natural
disasters were 65% higher from 1993 to 1998 than in the previous five-year
period.
Droughts Since 1999
1999:
Atlantic
Canada’s drought in 1999 wilted crops and parched livestock, and resulted in
some of the lowest rainfall totals in 50 years.
2000:
In
southern Alberta, many dryland grain producers suffered significant crop
failures, regardless of whether they had access to irrigation. Lethbridge
received no rain for over 60 days.
2001:
Drought
affected the whole country: the growing season was the driest in Canada in 34
years. Southern Alberta suffered its driest year in more than 130 years.
The 2001‑2002 winter was not only the eighth-warmest winter in
more than half a century, but also one of the driest.
2002:
While
Southern Alberta experienced flash flooding, intensive drought continued
through the rest of the province.
What is Climate?
Weather
affects our daily lives, sometimes dramatically, as illustrated by recent
extreme weather events in Canada. Weather can also vary drastically from one
year to another. This unpredictability compounds the risks faced by
weather-dependent sectors such as farming and forestry.
Managers in these sectors have to make investment decisions without
being certain of the weather for the next week, or even the next day.
Farmers, in particular, must make decisions without knowing what
meteorological conditions will occur for the upcoming growing season on which
their annual income may depend.
Climate,
however, is different from weather. Climate refers to average
meteorological conditions – temperature, precipitation, and wind patterns,
amongst other variables. Climate is not stable, but changes are apparent only
over long periods of time, including shifts between glacial and interglacial
periods. Historically, changes in climate have occurred at a slow enough pace
that humanity has been able to adapt to them without major disruptions. For
example, since the middle of the 20th century, we have seen a
northward expansion of crop varieties as a result of warming conditions and
research developments; winter wheat, almost unheard of in Western Canada in
the 1960s, has expanded in the Canadian Prairies. There is strong evidence,
however, that the rate of climate change will accelerate in the next century
at rates beyond those we historically had ability to adapt to. For example,
models suggest that the earth’s temperature will rise by 1.4oC to
5.8oC over the next 100 years, an increase that is unprecedented in
human history.
Why is Climate Change Important?
During
the course of its last study, the Senate Standing Committee on Agriculture and
Forestry heard much evidence from farmers across Canada about the 2001
drought, and how badly it had affected them. How will Canadians cope if such
droughts occur more frequently in areas where before they were exceptional
incidents? The projected change in climate will bring many changes in
precipitation patterns and wind patterns – in short, increased weather
variability from year to year. This variability is predicted to be
unlike what farmers, the forest industry, and rural communities have faced
before.
Canada’s
agricultural and forest industries, and our rural communities, must prepare
themselves for these climatic changes. Our challenge is to be able to adapt to
the predicted changes in climate. From November 2002 to May 2003, the
Committee heard from a variety of stakeholders – researchers at
universities, government organizations, and institutes in Canada, the United
States, and the United Kingdom; farmers, commodity groups, and foresters;
conservation and nature groups, and eco-tourism groups; representatives from
rural communities; and Aboriginal people. The Committee was pleased to
learn that Canadian scientists are at the forefront of climate change
research, and that our climate change models are considered amongst the best
in the world.
Focus on Adaptation
While
the Committee gathered evidence of the effects of climate change, its causes,
and mitigation efforts, it became clear that our agriculture and forest
industries must adapt to new climate conditions. Mitigation and adaptation
must go hand-in-hand for Canadians to cope successfully with our changing
climate. Unfortunately, very few concrete adaptation strategies have been
developed for our agriculture and forest industries. The Committee was struck
by the limited resources that have been allocated to adaptation research, in
comparison to the funds spent on mitigation techniques. In fact, this study
marks the first time a public forum has been held in Canada on the issue of
adaptation to what is commonly referred to as the biggest environmental
challenge facing our planet.
This
revelation was especially disconcerting given that the Government of
Canada’s own Climate Change Action Plan specifically recognizes that
“adaptation to climate change will be required regardless of the success of
actions to reduce emissions” (p. 51). In examining the impact of
climate change on Canada’s agriculture, forests, and rural communities, it
became clear to the Committee that adaptation strategies must be given a more
central focus in order to ensure that these industries and communities
continue to thrive in the future.
The Committee report is available in PDF format (Portable Document Format). These type of electronic documents retain the original look and feel -- complete with text, graphics, photos and colour -- of their printed versions, and can be disseminated independently of computer platform or distribution media.
Acrobat Readers are freely available and enable Windows, Macintosh, DOS and UNIX users to view, navigate through and print any PDF document.
If you need more information on how to use this format or require a reader for your platform, you may wish to visit Adobe Systems Incorporated.