Skip to content

CLIMATE CHANGE: WE ARE AT RISK

Standing Senate Committee on Agriculture and Forestry

INTERIM REPORT

The Honourable Donald Oliver, Q.C.,Chair
The Honourable John Wiebe, Deputy Chair

June 2003


MEMBERSHIP 

THE STANDING SENATE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY 

The Honourable Senators 

Liberals

*Sharon Carstairs, P.C. (or Robichaud, P.C.)
Thelma Chalifoux
Joseph Day
Joyce Fairbairn, P.C.
Elizabeth Hubley
Laurier L. LaPierre
Pierrette Ringuette
John (Jack) Wiebe (Deputy Chair)

Conservatives 

Leonard Gustafson 
Marjory LeBreton
*John Lynch-Staunton, P.C. (or Kinsella)
Donald Oliver, Q.C.(Chair)
David Tkachuk

 

(*Ex officio members)

Acting Clerk of the Committee
Keli Hogan

Analysts from the Research Branch, Library of Parliament
Frédéric Forge
Lorie Srivastava
Jean-Luc Bourdages 

Note:    The Honourable Senators Raynell Andreychuk; Pat Carney; Jane Cordy; Marisa Ferretti Barth; Joan Fraser; Jean Lapointe; Shirley Maheu; Frank Mahovlich; Lorna Milne; Wilfred P. Moore and David P. Smith also served on the Committee.


ORDER OF REFERENCE

Extract of the Journals of the Senate, Thursday, October 31, 2002:

The Honourable Senator Wiebe moved, seconded by the Honourable Senator Chalifoux:

That the Standing Senate Committee on Agriculture and Forestry be authorized to examine the impact of climate change on Canada’s agriculture, forests and rural communities and the potential adaptation options focusing on primary production, practices, technologies, ecosystems and other related areas;

That the papers and evidence received and taken on the subject and the work accomplished by the Standing Senate Committee on Agriculture and Forestry during the First Session of the Thirty-Seventh Parliament be referred to the Committee and;

That the Committee submit its final report no later than December 31, 2003.

The question being put on the motion, it was adopted.

Paul C. Bélisle
Clerk of the Senate


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOREWORD 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 
    The Saguenay Flood of 1996
    The Red River Flood of 1997
    The Ice Storm of 1998 
    Droughts Since 1999
    What is Climate?
    Why is Climate Change Important?
    Focus on Adaptation

CHAPTER 2: BACKGROUND ON CLIMATE CHANGE 
    A. Our Climate is Changing
    B. …And the Changes Will Affect Us 
    C. The Solution is to Reduce Emissions… 
        1. The Kyoto Protocol
        2. The Emissions Trading System
        3. The Decarbonization of Global Energy Systems
    D. ….And Adapt to the Effects
    Summary 

CHAPTER 3: EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON AGRICULTURE: WHAT DO WE KNOW?
    A. Biophysical Effects of Climate Change on Canadian Agriculture
    B. Economics Effects of Climate Change on Canadian Agriculture
    C. Adaptation Options for Agriculture
    Summary 

CHAPTER 4: EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON FORESTS: WHAT DO WE KNOW? 
    A. Biophysical Effects of Climate Change on Canada's Forests
    B. Adaptation Options for Forestry 
    Summary 

CHAPTER 5: EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON WATER
    A. Effects of Climate Change on Water Resources
    B. Water Stresses on Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Communities
    C. Adaptation Strategies For Water Resources
    Summary 

CHAPTER 6: EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON RURAL COMMUNITIES
    Summary

CHAPTER 7: EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON ABORIGINAL PEOPLE
    Summary

CHAPTER 8: WHAT DO WE NEED TO DO TO ADAPT?
    A. Research
        1. The Need for Integrated Research
        2. Areas of Research
        3. Fostering Research
    Summary
    B. Communication
        1. A Clear Message at the Right Time
        2. A National Communication Strategy
    Summary
    C. Government Policies and Programs
        1. Specific programs to Encourage Adaptation
        2. Incorporation Climate Change into Existing Programs and Policies
    Summary

CHAPTER 9: CONCLUSION - LESSONS LEARNED

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX B


LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 

AAFC              Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada  

APF                 Agriculture Policy Framework 

C-CIARN            Canadian Climate Change Impact and Adaptation Research Network  

CCAF              Climate Change Action Fund 

CCPC             Climate Change Plan for Canada 

CFA                Canadian Federation of Agriculture 

CFS                 Canadian Forest Service 

CO2                   Carbon dioxide 

GHG                Greenhouse gas 

IPCC               Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change  

N20                  Nitrous oxide

PARC             Prairie Adaptation Research Collaborative  

PFRA              Prairie Farm Rehabilitation Administration

WISE               Water Institute for Semi-arid Ecosystems


FOREWORD

From November 2002 to May 2003, the Senate Standing Committee on Agriculture and Forestry examined the effects of climate change on Canada’s agricultural and forestry sectors and rural communities. This study is a direct result of the Committee’s previous study, Canadian Farmers at Risk.[1] As part of that study, the Committee travelled to the Maritimes to hear from farmers about their concerns. Farmers repeatedly expressed apprehension about changes in climate and were unsure as to how they could cope with – or adapt to – apparently new climate scenarios. 

After identifying the leading researchers in the field of climate change and adaptation in Canada and abroad, the Committee heard from witnesses at the forefront in this area from universities, research centres, and governments across Canada as well as internationally. The Committee took a country-wide approach and actively sought the views of farmer organizations, rural associations, ecotourism groups, and environmental and conservation organizations from all regions of Canada. The Committee held hearings in Ottawa and travelled to Saskatchewan, Alberta, and British Columbia (see the Appendix for a complete list of witnesses). Throughout the hearings, the Committee was especially interested in learning about effective adaptation strategies for Canadians.   

Farmers, forest operators and rural communities are already facing and adapting to a wide range of risks and opportunities that arise from changes in market conditions, domestic regulations, trade policies, technology, and other factors.  This study thus extends the work presented in the Committee’s last report, Canadian Farmers at Risk, which examined short- and long-term issues affecting the health of Canada’s agricultural and agri-food industry. 

This interim report expresses the views and concerns of the various witnesses.  The Committee will release a final report in October 2003.  That report will provide specific recommendations to help ensure that Canada successfully responds and adapts to climate change, thereby assuring the continued prosperity of our agriculture and forestry sectors and our rural communities.


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Chapter 1: Introduction 

The Saguenay flood of 1996, the Red River flood of 1997, and the 1998 ice storm dominated the lives of several million Canadians and resulted in unprecedented numbers of weather-related insurance claims. Weather affects our daily lives, sometimes dramatically, as illustrated by these recent extreme weather events. Climate is different from weather: climate refers to average meteorological conditions – temperature, precipitation, and wind patterns, amongst other variables. But climate, too, can change, although the changes are apparent only over long periods of time.  

Historically, changes in climate have occurred at a slow enough pace that humanity has been able to adapt to them without major disruptions. There is strong evidence, however, that climate change will accelerate during the coming century at rates beyond our historical ability to adapt. The predicted impacts will include not only more frequent extreme weather events, but also long-term environmental shifts that will profoundly affect economies and lifestyles around the world.  For example, the main effect of climate change is likely to be on Canada’s water resources. 

During the course of its last study, the Senate Standing Committee on Agriculture and Forestry heard much evidence from farmers across Canada about the 2001 drought, and how badly it had affected them. How will Canadians cope if such droughts occur more frequently in areas where before they were exceptional incidents?  From November 2002 to May 2003, the Committee studied the effects of climate change on Canada’s agriculture, forests, and rural communities, with an emphasis on how these can best adapt to a changing climate. This summary highlights the Committee’s findings. The overview of chapter 2 provides some background on the issue of climate change, while the overviews of chapters 3 to 7 summarize the research and evidence gathered by the Committee on the potential effects of climate change on agriculture, forests, water, rural communities and Aboriginal people. Chapter 8 identifies areas for government action to help rural Canada in its adaptation efforts.

 

Chapter 2: Background on Climate Change 

The Committee was presented with evidence that shows our climate is, indeed, changing. One of the main indicators is the global trend of warming temperatures. Much of the scientific evidence was very technical, but it is included in this chapter since it provides important background for later chapters and recommendations:

·        It is accepted that the average surface temperature of the globe has increased about 0.6oC in the past 100 years, over sea and land. 

·        None of the natural factors affecting climate provides an obvious explanation for this observed global warming. 

·        By now there is sufficient scientific evidence to suggest that the warming trend of the earth observed in the last century is caused by human-induced emissions of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide (CO2). 

·        This warming trend is likely to continue at a rate unprecedented in human history, and it will have consequences at the regional level on temperature, precipitation patterns and, more importantly, the frequency of extreme weather events.

·        Because the warming effect will be amplified closer to the poles, countries such as Canada will be more vulnerable. In fact, some effects are already being felt in the northern part of the country.

 

There are actions that Canada and other countries can take to slow this change.  Essentially, we need to reduce our emissions of greenhouse gases, such as CO2:

·        The Kyoto Protocol binds industrial countries to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. Experts agree, however, that the implementation of the Protocol will not, by itself, curb – let alone reverse – the warming trend. 

·        The use of forests and agricultural soils to remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere will only be a temporary measure to help Canada meet its Kyoto commitment; it will have little effect on the overall amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

·        Stabilization of greenhouse gases at levels that avoid dangerous consequences for humanity will entail drastic measures far beyond those required for the Protocol. Hydrogen must become the fuel of the future, replacing fuels such as oil that are associated with emissions of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. This transition could be made possible by investing in nuclear and renewable sources of energy.

 

Experts also agree that the climate will take time to respond to the changing quantities of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. By the time we have significantly reduced greenhouse gas emissions, the climate will already have warmed and we will have had no choice but to adapt to new climatic conditions:

·        Aside from some initiatives such as Canada’s Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Program, which funds research, and the Canadian Climate Impacts and Adaptation Research Network (C-CIARN), only limited resources have been allocated to adaptation to climate change.

·        There is a need for a long-term commitment to support, fund and monitor progress toward adaptation, and the Government of Canada should take a leadership role on this issue.

 

General Remarks on Chapters 3, 4 and 5 

The Committee received evidence from many researchers – climatologists, soil scientists, resource economists, biologists, entomologists, and others – who provided detailed information about their work on the potential effects of climate change on agriculture, forestry, and water resources, as well as their studies of potential adaptation options. Chapters 3, 4 and 5 focus on the state of knowledge about the potential effects of climate change on these three resources. In order to put the findings into perspective, the following points should be noted:

·        Most of the research on the effects of climate change on agriculture, forests, and water resources uses models designed to study the planet as a whole. Model developers told the Committee that such models are too broad to give an accurate assessment of future implications at a regional level. 

·        Researchers involved in the field of impact and adaptation, however, believe that these models can, indeed, yield some useful results at a smaller scale; but they agree that it remains a challenge to try to downscale findings to local levels.

·        Results from these studies provide scenarios of plausible future events.  They are by no means forecasts of what climate change will bring.

·        The coverage of these studies has been somewhat piecemeal; they do not address the entire diversity of our country.

 

In light of the above-mentioned remarks, it is important that we try to develop greater accuracy and confidence regarding what will happen, and where. It is equally important that we first determine where Canada’s agriculture industry and our forest industry are vulnerable, in order to be able to improve their resilience. 

 

Chapter 3: Agriculture 

Changes in climatic conditions will affect agriculture in three different ways:

·        Changes in average climatic conditions will modify Canada’s agricultural map.  It is generally accepted that higher temperatures, and enhanced CO2 in the atmosphere, will enable better yields, new crops and a northward extension of agricultural land.  Locally, however, these benefits might be offset by a number of factors, including reduced water availability, limited soil availability in the north, increased soil erosion if droughts and floods become more frequent, increased insect outbreaks, and more vigorous weeds. 

·        All witnesses agreed that changes in the year to year variation in temperature and precipitation will be far more significant for the agricultural sector than changes in the average conditions.  We can expect that climate change will alter the frequency of anomalous years; that is, some extreme conditions will become less frequent, while others will become more frequent.  It was mentioned many times that Canada can expect more frequent and widespread droughts, particularly in the Prairies.  

·        The impact of climate change on the rest of the world will also have implications for Canada’s agricultural sector.  Many prices are determined by world markets, meaning that the economic effect on this sector in Canada will depend also on how Canadian productivity may change relative to that of other countries. 

 

Farmers are already innovative and adapt to various stresses, including variations in weather, trade policies, and commodity prices.  Historically, a range of adaptation options has been available to farmers to cope with various risks and conditions, and these options will continue to help them in the future. They are:

·        technological development, including the development of new crop varieties;

·        farm financial management, including crop insurance;

·        farm production practices, including diversification and irrigation; and

·        government programs, including support programs and taxation.

Technological development and improvements in agricultural practices will have an important role in enabling adaptation to climate change.  But it is crucial that farmers also improve their capacity to deal with the risks that currently exist, in order to enhance their ability to deal with future risk, including those associated with climate change.  Farmers will have to build on their strengths and identify where their farm operations are vulnerable. 

 

Chapter 4: Forests 

Climate change is also likely to affect Canada’s forests in different ways:

·        Researchers are not certain whether Canadian forests will experience increased or decreased productivity as a result of climate change.  On one hand, a longer growing season and increased CO2 in the atmosphere will encourage tree growth.  On the other hand, increased damage to forests and trees is expected due to winter thaws and extreme weather events (violent winds, for instance), and greater risk of forest fires and insect outbreaks such as the Mountain pine beetle in British Columbia.

·        Researchers also expect to see the temperate forests and the boreal forest move northward as a result of increased temperatures. A number of factors will limit this migration, however, and Canada could potentially lose species and end up with weedy and less vigorous forests.

·        Such impacts of climate change on forests are likely to affect Canadian society and the economy. For instance, socio-economic effects may include changes in timber supply and rent value, changes in land values, loss of forest for recreation, and dislocation of parks and natural areas.

The effects of climate change on forests will require appropriate anticipatory adaptation from the forest sector.  Notwithstanding the uncertainty about the impact of climate change on forest ecosystems over the next decades, several witnesses urged that the Canadian forest industry rapidly apply current knowledge on forest fires, insects and diseases in its long-term planning of forest operations. Current knowledge on forest fires, for example, can be used to plan for harvesting rotation.  

It was also stressed that the uncertain impact of climate change on the Canadian forest industry and on the rural communities that depend on healthy forests for their well-being may represent a good opportunity for all forestry stakeholders to undertake a profound reflection about forest management of the future. 

 

Chapter 5: Water 

The main effect of climate change is likely to be on Canada’s water resources.  While predictions of how precipitation regimes will change are very uncertain, evidence is consistent on the following points:

·        We can expect more variability in precipitation: there will be years that are wetter than normal, but there will be other years that are much drier than normal.  Storms and droughts may occur more often.

·        Adaptation measures will mainly concern engineering and infrastructure – irrigation, water treatment plants, etc. – but also technology to improve water use efficiency.  Those measures will vary locally and will depend on the users – agriculture, forestry, tourism, etc.

·        Given the demands for water by agriculture, the forest industry, and households in rural and urban areas, the evidence indicates that water-use conflicts will increase.

·        If water-use conflicts increase, decision-makers will have to determine what uses are appropriate and inappropriate, and where the available water is best allocated. 

 

Chapter 6: Rural Communities  

Rural Canada is an important contributor to the country’s wealth, supplying 15% of the Gross Domestic Product and 40% of Canadian exports. Because it relies largely on natural resource-based industries, rural Canada will be more vulnerable to climate change.  The following points arose from the hearings:

·        Over the past several decades, the population and composition of rural communities in Canada have been changing dramatically, due to migration and structural transformations in agriculture and other resource-based industries.  In 2000, for example, off-farm income represented 56% of the total farm income.

·        The livelihoods of rural Canadians are already stressed by low commodity prices and by trade conflicts such as the softwood lumber dispute, among other things. 

·        Climate change will bring additional stresses, which may aggravate those already affecting rural Canada.

·        Climate change will have significant financial and economic repercussions on natural resource-based industries.  If the financial basis of farming, forestry, and other natural resource-based industries is threatened, so is the viability of rural communities. 

·        Physical infrastructure in some communities will also be challenged by rising sea levels and increased weather-related damage.

·        Social cohesion will be threatened if, among other things, water use conflicts increase.

·        In order to cope with these changes, rural communities will have to start considering climate change in their planning.  A starting point could be to raise their awareness of this issue, notably through participation in C-CIARN workshops.  This stresses the importance of a communication strategy on climate change (chapter 8).

 

Chapter 7: Aboriginal People 

The Committee met with elected representatives from the Metis Nation of Alberta and the Kainai Nation. Representatives from C-CIARN North also provided insights into the situation of the Inuit. The following points were highlighted:

·        The knowledge and life experience of the elders have produced observations that are closely linked with recent scientific findings on the trend of climate change.

·        Indigenous peoples of the North are more sensitive to climate change than non‑indigenous peoples, because their homelands, culture, traditional knowledge, and hunting habitats will be directly affected.

·        Partnerships among scientists, aboriginal Nations, and northern communities have increased in the past two decades, notably in regions where scientific research has been focused.

·        Aboriginal people need better access to programs that would help them adapt to climate change.

·        As Aboriginal people achieve rights to the management of resources and land ownership, their organizations are seeking a more meaningful role in research, outreach action, and international negotiations on climate change.

 

Chapter 8: What Do We Need to Do to Adapt? 

While it is still too early to clearly identify effective adaptation measures that should be taken, there is room for government action. This chapter presents and discusses three areas for proactive action on climate change: research, communication, and government programs.

 

Research

While research on adaptation to climate change is still in its infancy, Canada is at the forefront and Canadian researchers are leading numerous international activities on this issue.  Such research, however, suffers from the following problems:

·        a lack of funding, relative to the funding allocated to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions;

·        a lack of suitably qualified graduate students; and

·        difficulty in securing funding for research that involves many different disciplines.

 

Witnesses suggested various approaches to fostering research:

·        enhance government research capacity;

·        facilitate partnerships between research organizations;

·        create research chairs on adaptation, and graduate student awards; and

·        create a central facility to bring together researchers from various disciplines.

 

Communication

Scientific information is complex by nature, and effective communication has been a common concern at all the public hearings. Three main points emerged from the hearings:

·        It is important not to sensationalize the issue and needlessly scare the public; nevertheless, the Committee would be remiss if it were to ignore the clear message from witnesses that Canada is soon likely to face much greater changes than it has experienced in the last hundred years. 

·        In addition to the conventional view that information must flow from researchers to the industries and communities, it is equally important that the research community learn from producers, the rural population, and Aboriginal people. As a relatively new entity, C-CIARN is beginning to initiate such two-way discussions between researchers and stakeholders.

·        A single, monolithic communications plan may not be appropriate to reach rural Canada. Any communications strategy should use existing networks within rural communities to ensure that current information is effectively distributed.  The capacity for extension services to deliver information to producers and woodlot owners has been severely curtailed over the last 20 to 30 years, and should be restored. 

·        The access to broadband technology is also essential to rural communities to enable rural Canadians to actively search the information by themselves.

 

Government Programs

Current public policies such as taxation, farm programs, and provincial regulations on forest practices may either hinder or encourage adaptation efforts. In order to create a favourable environment that allows farmers and forest operators to adapt, governments should consider the following points:

·        To adapt proactively to climate change, the agriculture and forest industries may require longer-term incentives that would counter the short-term ones provided by markets. 

·        A general goal of government policies should be to encourage the adoption of opportunities to adapt to climate change, or at the very least to avoid preventing the adoption of such opportunities. Therefore, climate change considerations should be incorporated into Canadian agricultural policy, forest management legislation, certification standards for environmentally friendly products, and other policies that are relevant to the well-being of rural communities.  In doing this, we will make our industries, ecosystems, and communities less vulnerable to climatic changes, while also helping them to adapt to other stresses.




[1] Canadian Farmers At Risk, Report of the Standing Senate Committee on Agriculture and Forestry. June 2002. 1st Session, 37th Parliament. Available at  /en/Content/SEN/Committee/371/agri/rep/rep10jun02-e.htm.

 


CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

The Saguenay Flood of 1996 

The Saguenay Flood was Canada’s first $1-billion disaster. Torrential rains over Quebec’s Saguenay region during 19-21 July led to flooding and mudslides that destroyed parts of Chicoutimi, Jonquière, La Baie, Ferland, and Boilleau. In a few hours, the area around La Baie, Bagotville, and Jonquière was transformed into a soup of mud. Several people died and 10,000 had to flee their homes. There were 16,000 victims in total. Most local power and about 8,000 land-line telephones were cut off, creating a widespread emergency situation.

 

The Red River Flood of 1997  

The Canadian portion of the Red River crested at Winnipeg early on May 4, causing the worst flooding the region had seen since 1852. With more than 256,000 hectares under water across southern Manitoba and the Dakotas, about 75,000 people were forced to abandon their homes. The river turned into a huge lake, nicknamed the Red Sea, which covered 1,840 square kilometres. The eight-week ordeal caused $450 million in damage. It is estimated that damage would have exceeded $6 billion without the Red River Floodway, constructed in the 1960s to divert floodwaters around Winnipeg.

 

The Ice Storm of 1998  

The ice storm dominated lives and landscapes in huge areas of eastern Canada during January 1998. It affected five million people – about 17 per cent of Canada’s population – and stretched a distance of more than 1,000 kilometres, from Georgian Bay to the Bay of Fundy. Eastern Ontario and Quebec were pelted by freezing rain that clung to trees, power lines and transmission towers for six days. Thirty-five people died, and millions of trees were destroyed. More than a million people in Quebec and about 100,000 in Ontario were left without power for days. Insurance claim payouts approached $1.44 billion, three times the amount paid out for any other natural disaster in Canada; total costs were estimated at $2.5 billion.  

The Saguenay flood of 1996, the Red River flood of 1997, and the 1998 ice storm resulted in the highest number of weather-related insurance claims ever made in Canada. Before 1998, Canadian insurers had never paid out more than $500 million for natural disaster claims in any year. Costs related to natural disasters were 65% higher from 1993 to 1998 than in the previous five-year period.  

Droughts Since 1999  

1999:

Atlantic Canada’s drought in 1999 wilted crops and parched livestock, and resulted in some of the lowest rainfall totals in 50 years.

2000:

In southern Alberta, many dryland grain producers suffered significant crop failures, regardless of whether they had access to irrigation. Lethbridge received no rain for over 60 days.

2001:

Drought affected the whole country: the growing season was the driest in Canada in 34 years. Southern Alberta suffered its driest year in more than 130 years.  The 2001‑2002 winter was not only the eighth-warmest winter in more than half a century, but also one of the driest.

2002:

While Southern Alberta experienced flash flooding, intensive drought continued through the rest of the province.

 

What is Climate?  

Weather affects our daily lives, sometimes dramatically, as illustrated by recent extreme weather events in Canada. Weather can also vary drastically from one year to another. This unpredictability compounds the risks faced by weather-dependent sectors such as farming and forestry.  Managers in these sectors have to make investment decisions without being certain of the weather for the next week, or even the next day.  Farmers, in particular, must make decisions without knowing what meteorological conditions will occur for the upcoming growing season on which their annual income may depend.  

Climate, however, is different from weather. Climate refers to average meteorological conditions – temperature, precipitation, and wind patterns, amongst other variables. Climate is not stable, but changes are apparent only over long periods of time, including shifts between glacial and interglacial periods. Historically, changes in climate have occurred at a slow enough pace that humanity has been able to adapt to them without major disruptions. For example, since the middle of the 20th century, we have seen a northward expansion of crop varieties as a result of warming conditions and research developments; winter wheat, almost unheard of in Western Canada in the 1960s, has expanded in the Canadian Prairies. There is strong evidence, however, that the rate of climate change will accelerate in the next century at rates beyond those we historically had ability to adapt to. For example, models suggest that the earth’s temperature will rise by 1.4oC to 5.8oC over the next 100 years, an increase that is unprecedented in human history.

 

Why is Climate Change Important?  

During the course of its last study, the Senate Standing Committee on Agriculture and Forestry heard much evidence from farmers across Canada about the 2001 drought, and how badly it had affected them. How will Canadians cope if such droughts occur more frequently in areas where before they were exceptional incidents? The projected change in climate will bring many changes in precipitation patterns and wind patterns – in short, increased weather variability from year to year. This variability is predicted to be unlike what farmers, the forest industry, and rural communities have faced before.  

Canada’s agricultural and forest industries, and our rural communities, must prepare themselves for these climatic changes. Our challenge is to be able to adapt to the predicted changes in climate. From November 2002 to May 2003, the Committee heard from a variety of stakeholders – researchers at universities, government organizations, and institutes in Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom; farmers, commodity groups, and foresters; conservation and nature groups, and eco-tourism groups; representatives from rural communities; and Aboriginal people. The Committee was pleased to learn that Canadian scientists are at the forefront of climate change research, and that our climate change models are considered amongst the best in the world.

 

Focus on Adaptation  

While the Committee gathered evidence of the effects of climate change, its causes, and mitigation efforts, it became clear that our agriculture and forest industries must adapt to new climate conditions. Mitigation and adaptation must go hand-in-hand for Canadians to cope successfully with our changing climate. Unfortunately, very few concrete adaptation strategies have been developed for our agriculture and forest industries. The Committee was struck by the limited resources that have been allocated to adaptation research, in comparison to the funds spent on mitigation techniques. In fact, this study marks the first time a public forum has been held in Canada on the issue of adaptation to what is commonly referred to as the biggest environmental challenge facing our planet. 

This revelation was especially disconcerting given that the Government of Canada’s own Climate Change Action Plan specifically recognizes that “adaptation to climate change will be required regardless of the success of actions to reduce emissions” (p. 51). In examining the impact of climate change on Canada’s agriculture, forests, and rural communities, it became clear to the Committee that adaptation strategies must be given a more central focus in order to ensure that these industries and communities continue to thrive in the future.


PDF FORMAT

The Committee report is available in PDF format (Portable Document Format). These type of electronic documents retain the original look and feel -- complete with text, graphics, photos and colour -- of their printed versions, and can be disseminated independently of computer platform or distribution media.

Acrobat Readers are freely available and enable Windows, Macintosh, DOS and UNIX users to view, navigate through and print any PDF document.

If you need more information on how to use this format or require a reader for your platform, you may wish to visit Adobe Systems Incorporated.


Back to top