Order Paper and Notice Paper
The Order Paper and Notice Paper is a document that guides the deliberations of the Senate and lists items of business currently before it. These items are listed in several different categories and in a priority according to an arrangement adopted by the Senate as stipulated in the rules. The majority of these items constitute the Orders of the Day which are called following Routine Proceedings. These items are themselves divided into two principal categories - government business and other business. Within each of these two categories are items for bills, motions, inquiries and reports of committees.
The Notice Paper contains the text of motions and inquiries not yet called for debate.
The Order Paper and Notice Paper is prepared every day in advance of the actual sitting.
Order of Business
(The following is an outline of a typical sitting day in the Senate. Variations are possible subject to the Rules and to the decisions of the Senate.)
Senators' Statements (15 minutes)
ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS (30 minutes)
1. Tabling of Documents
2. Presenting or Tabling Reports from Committees
3. Government Notices of Motions
4. Government Notices of Inquiries
5. Introduction and First Reading of Government Bills
6. Introduction and First Reading of Senate Public Bills
7. First Reading of Commons Public Bills
8. Reading of Petitions for Private Bills
9. Introduction and First Reading of Private Bills
10. Tabling of Reports from Interparliamentary Delegations
11. Notices of Motions
12. Notices of Inquiries
13. Tabling of Petitions
Question Period (30 minutes)
Delayed Answers
ORDERS OF THE DAY
Government Business
• Bills — Messages from the House of Commons
• Bills — Third Reading
• Bills — Reports of Committees
• Bills — Second Reading
• Reports of Committees — Other
• Motions
• Inquiries
• Other
Other Business
• Bills — Messages from the House of Commons
• Senate Public Bills — Third Reading
• Commons Public Bills — Third Reading
• Private Bills — Third Reading
• Senate Public Bills — Reports of Committees
• Commons Public Bills — Reports of Committees
• Private Bills — Reports of Committees
• Senate Public Bills — Second Reading
• Commons Public Bills — Second Reading
• Private Bills — Second Reading
• Reports of Committees — Other
• Motions
• Inquiries
• Other
NOTICE PAPER
• Notices of Motions
• Notices of Inquiries
Orders Of The Day
Government Business
Bills – Messages from the House of Commons
No. 1.
May 30, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Harder, P.C., seconded by the Honourable Senator Bellemare:
That the Senate do not insist on its amendments to Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, to which the House of Commons has disagreed; and
That a message be sent to the House of Commons to acquaint that house accordingly.
Bills – Third Reading
No. 1.
May 30, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Mitchell, seconded by the Honourable Senator Gagné, for the third reading of Bill C-16, An Act to amend the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Criminal Code.
Bills – Reports of Committees
Nil
Bills – Second Reading
Nil
Reports of Committees – Other
No. 1.
June 1, 2017—Consideration of the fourteenth report of the Standing Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade (Subject matter of Bill C-44, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 22, 2017 and other measures), tabled in the Senate on June 1, 2017.
No. 2.
June 6, 2017—Consideration of the fourteenth report of the Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology (Subject matter of Bill C-44, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 22, 2017 and other measures), tabled in the Senate on June 6, 2017.
No. 3.
June 6, 2017—Consideration of the sixteenth report of the Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs (Subject matter of Bill C-44, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 22, 2017 and other measures), tabled in the Senate on June 6, 2017.
No. 4.
June 6, 2017—Consideration of the twelfth report of the Standing Senate Committee on National Security and Defence (Subject matter of Bill C-44, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 22, 2017 and other measures), tabled in the Senate on June 6, 2017.
No. 5.
June 7, 2017—Consideration of the fourteenth report of the Standing Senate Committee on Banking, Trade and Commerce (Subject matter of Bill C-44, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 22, 2017 and other measures), tabled in the Senate on June 7, 2017.
Motions
No. 1.
December 8, 2015—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Jaffer, seconded by the Honourable Senator Cordy:
That the following Address be presented to His Excellency the Governor General of Canada:
To His Excellency the Right Honourable David Johnston, Chancellor and Principal Companion of the Order of Canada, Chancellor and Commander of the Order of Military Merit, Chancellor and Commander of the Order of Merit of the Police Forces, Governor General and Commander-in-Chief of Canada.
MAY IT PLEASE YOUR EXCELLENCY:
We, Her Majesty’s most loyal and dutiful subjects, the Senate of Canada in Parliament assembled, beg leave to offer our humble thanks to Your Excellency for the gracious Speech which Your Excellency has addressed to both Houses of Parliament.
No. 106.
By the Honourable Senator Harder, P.C.:
June 1, 2017—That, in accordance with Section 49 of the Official Languages Act, R.S.C., 1985, Chapter 31 (4th Supp.), the Senate approve the appointment of Madeleine Meilleur as Commissioner of Official Languages.
No. 107.
By the Honourable Senator Bellemare:
June 7, 2017—That, when the Senate next adjourns after the adoption of this motion, it do stand adjourned until Tuesday, June 13, 2017, at 2 p.m.
Inquiries
No. 2.
By the Honourable Senator Harder, P.C.:
March 28, 2017—That he will call the attention of the Senate to the budget entitled Building a Strong Middle Class, tabled in the House of Commons on March 22, 2017, by the Minister of Finance, the Honourable Bill Morneau, P.C., M.P., and in the Senate on March 28, 2017.
Other
Nil
Other Business
Rule 4-15(2) states:
Except as otherwise ordered by the Senate, any item of Other Business on the Order Paper and any motion or inquiry on the Notice Paper that have not been proceeded with during 15 sitting days shall be dropped from the Order Paper and Notice Paper.
Consequently, the number appearing in parentheses indicates the number of sittings since the item was last proceeded with.
Bills – Messages from the House of Commons
Nil
Senate Public Bills – Third Reading
No. 1. (two)
March 28, 2017—Third reading of Bill S-213, An Act to amend the Constitution Act, 1867 and the Parliament of Canada Act (Speakership of the Senate).—(Honourable Senator Mercer)
No. 2. (fifteen)
April 4, 2017—Third reading of Bill S-219, An Act to deter Iran-sponsored terrorism, incitement to hatred, and human rights violations.—(Honourable Senator Tkachuk)
Commons Public Bills – Third Reading
No. 1.
March 7, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Lankin, P.C., seconded by the Honourable Senator Petitclerc, for the third reading of Bill C-210, An Act to amend the National Anthem Act (gender).
STANDING VOTE DEFERRED TO 5:30 P.M., PURSUANT TO RULE 9-10(2) AND THE BELLS TO SOUND AT 5:15 P.M. FOR FIFTEEN MINUTES (Rule 9-6)
And on the motion in amendment of the Honourable Senator Plett, seconded by the Honourable Senator Wells:
That Bill C-210 be not now read a third time, but that it be amended in the schedule, on page 2, by replacing the words “in all of” with the words “thou dost in”.
No. 2. (one)
June 6, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Stewart Olsen, seconded by the Honourable Senator Seidman, for the third reading of Bill C-233, An Act respecting a national strategy for Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias.—(Honourable Senator Mégie)
Private Bills – Third Reading
Nil
Senate Public Bills – Reports of Committees
Nil
Commons Public Bills – Reports of Committees
Nil
Private Bills – Reports of Committees
Nil
Senate Public Bills – Second Reading
No. 1. (fourteen)
February 2, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Hervieux-Payette, P.C., seconded by the Honourable Senator Joyal, P.C., for the second reading of Bill S-206, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (protection of children against standard child-rearing violence).—(Honourable Senator Martin)
No. 2. (eleven)
March 24, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Patterson, seconded by the Honourable Senator Enverga, for the second reading of Bill S-221, An Act to amend the Constitution Act, 1867 (Property qualifications of Senators).—(Honourable Senator Harder, P.C.)
No. 3. (ten)
December 15, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Moore, seconded by the Honourable Senator Joyal, P.C., for the second reading of Bill S-234, An Act to amend the Parliament of Canada Act (Parliamentary Artist Laureate).—(Honourable Senator Martin)
No. 4. (three)
March 9, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Ataullahjan, seconded by the Honourable Senator Plett, for the second reading of Bill S-235, An Act to amend the Prohibiting Cluster Munitions Act (investments).—(Honourable Senator Harder, P.C.)
No. 5. (five)
May 16, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Ringuette, seconded by the Honourable Senator Bovey, for the second reading of Bill S-237, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (criminal interest rate).—(Honourable Senator Martin)
No. 6. (five)
May 16, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator MacDonald, seconded by the Honourable Senator Tkachuk, for the second reading of Bill S-238, An Act to amend the Fisheries Act and the Wild Animal and Plant Protection and Regulation of International and Interprovincial Trade Act (importation of shark fins).—(Honourable Senator Martin)
No. 7. (two)
June 1, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Frum, seconded by the Honourable Senator Housakos, for the second reading of Bill S-239, An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act (eliminating foreign funding).—(Honourable Senator Omidvar)
Commons Public Bills – Second Reading
No. 1. (two)
May 31, 2017—Second reading of Bill C-277, An Act providing for the development of a framework on palliative care in Canada.—(Honourable Senator Eaton)
No. 2.
June 7, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Gold, seconded by the Honourable Senator Saint-Germain, for the second reading of Bill C-305, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (mischief).—(Honourable Senator Frum)
No. 3.
June 6, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Andreychuk, seconded by the Honourable Senator Seidman, for the second reading of Bill C-337, An Act to amend the Judges Act and the Criminal Code (sexual assault).—(Honourable Senator Pate)
Private Bills – Second Reading
Nil
Reports of Committees – Other
No. 1. (twelve)
November 15, 2016—Resuming debate on the consideration of the first report (interim) of the Special Senate Committee on Senate Modernization, entitled Senate Modernization: Moving Forward, deposited with the Clerk of the Senate on October 4, 2016.—(Honourable Senator Bellemare)
No. 5. (fourteen)
November 2, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Tannas, seconded by the Honourable Senator Wells, for the adoption of the sixth report (interim) of the Special Senate Committee on Senate Modernization, entitled Senate Modernization: Moving Forward (Speakership), presented in the Senate on October 5, 2016.—(Honourable Senator Fraser)
No. 6. (seven)
November 22, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Massicotte, seconded by the Honourable Senator Moore for the adoption of the seventh report (interim), as amended, of the Special Senate Committee on Senate Modernization, entitled Senate Modernization: Moving Forward (Regional interest), presented in the Senate on October 18, 2016.—(Honourable Senator Martin)
No. 7. (ten)
February 28, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Frum, seconded by the Honourable Senator Beyak for the adoption of the ninth report (interim) of the Special Senate Committee on Senate Modernization, entitled Senate Modernization: Moving Forward (Question Period), presented in the Senate on October 25, 2016.—(Honourable Senator Mercer)
No. 8.
December 12, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Joyal, P.C., seconded by the Honourable Senator Cordy for the adoption of the tenth report (interim), as amended, of the Special Senate Committee on Senate Modernization, entitled Senate Modernization: Moving Forward (Nature), presented in the Senate on October 26, 2016.—(Honourable Senator Martin)
No. 10. (two)
March 7, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator MacDonald, seconded by the Honourable Senator Patterson:
That the sixth report of the Standing Senate Committee on Transport and Communications, entitled Pipelines for Oil: Protecting our Economy, Respecting our Environment, deposited with the Clerk of the Senate on December 7, 2016 be adopted and that, pursuant to rule 12-24(1), the Senate request a complete and detailed response from the government, with the Minister of Natural Resources being identified as minister responsible for responding to the report, in consultation with the Ministers of Transport and Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard.—(Honourable Senator Hubley)
No. 11.
March 28, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Andreychuk, seconded by the Honourable Senator Greene:
That the seventh report of the Standing Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade, entitled Free Trade Agreements: A Tool for Economic Prosperity, tabled with the Clerk of the Senate on Tuesday, February 7, 2017, be adopted and that, pursuant to rule 12-24(1), the Senate request a complete and detailed response from the government, with the Minister of International Trade being identified as minister responsible for responding to the report, in consultation with the Minister of Foreign Affairs.—(Honourable Senator Bellemare)
No. 12. (one)
March 7, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Smith, seconded by the Honourable Senator Ataullahjan:
That the twelfth report of the Standing Senate Committee on National Finance entitled Smarter Planning, Smarter Spending: Achieving infrastructure success, tabled with the Clerk of the Senate on February 28, 2017 be adopted and that, pursuant to rule 12-24(1), the Senate request a complete and detailed response from the government, with the Minister of Infrastructure and Communities being identified as minister responsible for responding to the report.—(Honourable Senator Bellemare)
No. 14. (one)
June 1, 2017—Resuming debate on the consideration of the fifth report (interim) of the Standing Senate Committee on Energy, the Environment and Natural Resources, entitled Positioning Canada’s Electricity Sector in a Carbon Constrained Future, deposited with the Clerk of the Senate on March 7, 2017.—(Honourable Senator Martin)
No. 15.
March 28, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Fraser, seconded by the Honourable Senator Hubley for the adoption of the fourth report (interim) of the Standing Committee on Rules, Procedures and the Rights of Parliament, entitled Sessional Order, presented in the Senate on March 7, 2017.—(Honourable Senator Martin)
No. 17.
June 6, 2017—Resuming debate on the consideration of the second report of the Standing Joint Committee for the Scrutiny of Regulations, entitled Accessibility of Documents Incorporated by Reference in Federal Regulations, presented in the Senate on March 30, 2017.—(Honourable Senator Day)
No. 18.
June 6, 2017—Resuming debate on the consideration of the third report of the Standing Joint Committee for the Scrutiny of Regulations, entitled Marginal Notes of federal Acts and regulations, presented in the Senate on March 30, 2017.—(Honourable Senator Day)
No. 29. (four)
May 9, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Lang, seconded by the Honourable Senator Smith, for the adoption of the tenth report (interim) of the Standing Senate Committee on National Security and Defence, entitled Military underfunded: The walk must match the talk, deposited with the Clerk of the Senate on April 13, 2017.—(Honourable Senator Eggleton, P.C.)
No. 31. (eleven)
April 13, 2017—Consideration of the sixth report of the Standing Committee on Rules, Procedures and the Rights of Parliament, entitled Report on the Case of Privilege Relating to Leaks of the Auditor General's Report on the Audit of Senators' Expenses, presented in the Senate on April 13, 2017.—(Honourable Senator Fraser)
No. 33. (five)
May 11, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Lang, seconded by the Honourable Senator Martin:
That the eleventh report of the Standing Senate Committee on National Security and Defence, entitled Reinvesting in the Canadian Armed Forces: A plan for the future, deposited with the Clerk of the Senate on May 8, 2017, be adopted and that, pursuant to rule 12-24(1), the Senate request a complete and detailed response from the government, with the Minister of National Defence being identified as minister responsible for responding to the report.—(Honourable Senator Eggleton, P.C.)
No. 35. (four)
May 16, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Housakos, seconded by the Honourable Senator Martin for the adoption of the twelfth report of the Standing Committee on Internal Economy, Budgets and Administration, entitled Revised Senate Administrative Rules, presented in the Senate on May 9, 2017.—(Honourable Senator Pratte)
No. 37. (three)
May 18, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Housakos, seconded by the Honourable Senator Neufeld, for the adoption of the thirteenth report of the Standing Committee on Internal Economy, Budgets and Administration (Budget—pursuant to rule 12-7(1), consideration of financial and administrative matters—power to hire staff), presented in the Senate on May 16, 2017.
And on the motion in amendment of the Honourable Senator Fraser, seconded by the Honourable Senator Cools:
That the report be amended to provide that, in the Summary of Budget, under Professional and other services, the sum of $108,000 be deleted and replaced by $250,000.—(Honourable Senator Ringuette)
No. 39.
June 6, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Tardif, seconded by the Honourable Senator Joyal, P.C.:
That the fourth report of the Standing Senate Committee on Official Languages, entitled Horizon 2018: Toward Stronger Support of French-language Learning in British Columbia, tabled in the Senate on May 31, 2017, be adopted and that, pursuant to rule 12-24(1), the Senate request a complete and detailed response from the government, with the Minister of Canadian Heritage being identified as minister responsible for responding to the report, in consultation with the Ministers of Public Services and Procurement, Families, Children and Social Development, Innovation, Science and Economic Development and Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship.—(Honourable Senator Gagné)
No. 40. (one)
June 1, 2017—Consideration of the thirteenth report of the Standing Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade, entitled A turning point in Canada-Argentina Relations?, tabled in the Senate on June 1, 2017.—(Honourable Senator Andreychuk)
Motions
No. 31. (nine)
February 2, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Bellemare, seconded by the Honourable Senator Enverga:
That the Senate — in order to ensure transparency in the awarding of public funds and foster efficiency in infrastructure projects in the larger context of economic diversification and movement toward a greener economy, all while avoiding undue intervention in the federal-provincial division of powers — encourage the government to make provision in the budget for the creation of the Canadian Infrastructure Oversight and Best Practices Council, made up of experts in infrastructure projects from the provinces and territories, whose principal roles would be to:
1.collect information on federally funded infrastructure projects;
2. study the costs and benefits of federally funded infrastructure projects;
3. identify procurements best practices and of risk sharing;
4. promote these best practices among governments; and
5. promote project managers skills development; and
That a message be sent to the House of Commons to acquaint that House with the above.—(Honourable Senator Martin)
No. 73. (eleven)
March 24, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Patterson, seconded by the Honourable Senator Runciman:
Whereas the Senate provides representation for groups that are often underrepresented in Parliament, such as Aboriginal peoples, visible minorities and women;
Whereas paragraph (3) of section 23 of the Constitution Act, 1867 requires that, in order to be qualified for appointment to and to maintain a place in the Senate, a person must own land with a net worth of at least four thousand dollars in the province for which he or she is appointed;
Whereas a person’s personal circumstances or the availability of real property in a particular location may prevent him or her from owning the required property;
Whereas appointment to the Senate should not be restricted to those who own real property of a minimum net worth;
Whereas the existing real property qualification is inconsistent with the democratic values of modern Canadian society and is no longer an appropriate or relevant measure of the fitness of a person to serve in the Senate;
Whereas, in the case of Quebec, each of the twenty-four Senators representing the province must be appointed for and must have either their real property qualification in or be resident of a specified Electoral Division;
Whereas an amendment to the Constitution of Canada in relation to any provision that applies to one or more, but not all, provinces may be made by proclamation issued by the Governor General under the Great Seal of Canada only where so authorized by resolutions of the Senate and House of Commons and of the legislative assembly of each province to which the amendment applies;
Whereas the Supreme Court of Canada has determined that a full repeal of paragraph (3) of section 23 of the Constitution Act, 1867, respecting the real property qualification of Senators, would require a resolution of the Quebec National Assembly pursuant to section 43 of the Constitution Act, 1982;
Now, therefore, the Senate resolves that an amendment to the Constitution of Canada be authorized to be made by proclamation issued by His Excellency the Governor General under the Great Seal of Canada in accordance with the Schedule hereto.
SCHEDULE
AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF CANADA
1.(1) Paragraph (3) of section 23 of the Constitution Act, 1867 is repealed.
(2) Section 23 of the Act is amended by replacing the semi-colon at the end of paragraph (5) with a period and by repealing paragraph (6).
2.The Declaration of Qualification set out in The Fifth Schedule to the Act is replaced by the following:
I, A.B., do declare and testify that I am by law duly qualified to be appointed a member of the Senate of Canada.
3.This Amendment may be cited as the Constitution Amendment, [year of proclamation] (Real property qualification of Senators).—(Honourable Senator Ringuette)
No. 89. (one)
May 12, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Bellemare, seconded by the Honourable Senator Harder, P.C.:
That, in order to ensure that legislative reports of Senate committees follow a transparent, comprehensible and non-partisan methodology, the Rules of the Senate be amended by replacing rule 12-23(1) by the following:
“Obligation to report bill
12-23. (1) The committee to which a bill has been referred shall report the bill to the Senate. The report shall set out any amendments that the committee is recommending. In addition, the report shall have appended to it the committee’s observations on:
(a) whether the bill generally conforms with the Constitution of Canada, including:
(i) the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and
(ii) the division of legislative powers between Parliament and the provincial and territorial legislatures;
(b) whether the bill conforms with treaties and international agreements that Canada has signed or ratified;
(c) whether the bill unduly impinges on any minority or economically disadvantaged groups;
(d) whether the bill has any impact on one or more provinces or territories;
(e) whether the appropriate consultations have been conducted;
(f) whether the bill contains any obvious drafting errors;
(g) all amendments moved but not adopted in the committee, including the text of these amendments; and
(h) any other matter that, in the committee’s opinion, should be brought to the attention of the Senate.”
And on the motion in amendment of the Honourable Senator Nancy Ruth, seconded by the Honourable Senator Tkachuk:
That the motion be not now adopted, but that it be amended by:
1.adding the following new subsection after proposed subsection (c):
“(d) whether the bill has received substantive gender-based analysis;”; and
2.by changing the designation for current proposed subsections (d) to (h) to (e) to (i).—(Honourable Senator Martin)
No. 92. (nine)
May 17, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Ngo, seconded by the Honourable Senator Cowan:
That the Senate note with concern the escalating and hostile behaviour exhibited by the People’s Republic of China in the South China Sea and consequently urge the Government of Canada to encourage all parties involved, and in particular the People’s Republic of China, to:
(a) recognize and uphold the rights of freedom of navigation and overflight as enshrined in customary international law and in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea;
(b) cease all activities that would complicate or escalate the disputes, such as the construction of artificial islands, land reclamation, and further militarization of the region;
(c) abide by all previous multilateral efforts to resolve the disputes and commit to the successful implementation of a binding Code of Conduct in the South China Sea;
(d) commit to finding a peaceful and diplomatic solution to the disputes in line with the provisions of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and respect the settlements reached through international arbitration; and
(e) strengthen efforts to significantly reduce the environmental impacts of the disputes upon the fragile ecosystem of the South China Sea;
That the Senate also urge the Government of Canada to support its regional partners and allies and to take additional steps necessary to de-escalate tensions and restore the peace and stability of the region; and
That a message be sent to the House of Commons to acquaint it with the foregoing.
And on the motion of the Honourable Senator Ringuette, seconded by the Honourable Senator Lankin, P.C.:
That the question under debate be referred to the Standing Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade.—(Honourable Senator Martin)
No. 139. (one)
February 7, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Joyal, P.C., seconded by the Honourable Senator Eggleton, P.C.:
That with Canada celebrating 150 years as a nation and acknowledging the lasting contribution of the First Nations, early settlers, and the continuing immigration of peoples from around the world who have made and continue to make Canada the great nation that it is, the Senate urge the Government to commit to establishing a National Portrait Gallery using the former US Embassy across from Parliament Hill as a lasting legacy to mark this important milestone in Canada’s history and in recognition of the people who contributed to its success.—(Honourable Senator Martin)
No. 146. (thirteen)
December 12, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Ringuette, seconded by the Honourable Senator Lankin, P.C.:
That the Standing Senate Committee on Banking, Trade, and Commerce be authorized to:
(a)Review the operations of the Financial Consumer Agency of Canada (FCAC), the Ombudsman for Banking Services and Investments (OBSI), and ADR Chambers Banking Ombuds Office (ADRBO);
(b)Review the agencies’ interaction with and respect for provincial jurisdictions;
(c)Review and determine best practices from similar agencies in other jurisdictions;
(d)Provide recommendations to ensure that the FCAC, OBSI, and ADRBO can better protect consumers and respect provincial jurisdiction; and
That the Committee submit its final report no later than May 31, 2017, and retain all powers necessary to publicize its findings until 180 days after the tabling of the final report.—(Honourable Senator Tkachuk)
No. 158. (five)
February 7, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Merchant, seconded by the Honourable Senator Housakos:
That the Senate call upon the government of Canada:
(a) to recognize the genocide of the Pontic Greeks of 1916 to 1923 and to condemn any attempt to deny or distort a historical truth as being anything less than genocide, a crime against humanity; and
(b) to designate May 19th of every year hereafter throughout Canada as a day of remembrance of the over 353,000 Pontic Greeks who were killed or expelled from their homes.—(Honourable Senator Moncion)
No. 174. (three)
May 18, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Enverga, seconded by the Honourable Senator Runciman:
That the Rules of the Senate be amended by replacing rule 4 by the following:
“Prayers and National Anthem
4-1.(1) The Speaker shall proceed to Prayers as soon as a quorum is seen, and, on a Tuesday, shall then call upon a Senator or guests to lead in singing the bilingual version of O Canada.
Guest singers
4-1.(2) The Speaker may invite guests to enter the galleries to lead in singing the National Anthem.” —(Honourable Senator Enverga)
No. 189. (seven)
May 8, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Ringuette, seconded by the Honourable Senator McCoy:
That the Rules of the Senate be amended by:
1.replacing the period at the end of rule 12-7(16) by the following:
“; and
Human Resources
12-7. (17) the Standing Senate Committee on Human Resources, to which may be referred matters relating to human resources generally.”; and
2.updating all cross references in the Rules accordingly.—(Honourable Senator Bellemare)
No. 192. (one)
May 4, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Watt, seconded by the Honourable Senator Cordy:
That a Special Committee on the Arctic be appointed to consider the significant and rapid changes to the Arctic, and impacts on original inhabitants;
That the committee be composed of ten members, to be nominated by the Committee of Selection, and that five members constitute a quorum;
That the committee have the power to send for persons, papers and records; to examine witnesses; and to publish such papers and evidence from day to day as may be ordered by the committee;
That the committee be authorized to hire outside experts;
That, notwithstanding rule 12-18(2)(b)(i), the committee have the power to sit from Monday to Friday, even though the Senate may then be adjourned for a period exceeding one week; and
That the committee be empowered to report from time to time and to submit its final report no later than December 10, 2018, and retain all powers necessary to publicize its findings until 60 days after the tabling of the final report.—(Honourable Senator Omidvar)
No. 194. (ten)
April 6, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Housakos, seconded by the Honourable Senator Smith:
That the Standing Senate Committee on Transport and Communications be authorized to examine and report on issues related to the 373 million dollars of federal public money on loan to Bombardier Inc., including but not limited to the overall value for investment on behalf of Canadians; and
That the committee submit its final report to the Senate no later than June 7, 2017 and that the committee retain all powers necessary to publicize its findings until 180 days after the tabling of the final report.
And on the motion in amendment of the Honourable Senator Pratte, seconded by the Honourable Senator Mitchell:
That the motion be not now adopted, but that it be amended:
(a)by replacing the words “Transport and Communications” by the words “National Finance”;
(b)by replacing all the words in the first paragraph following the words “related to” by the words “public assistance provided to multinational companies by the Government of Canada, including the 350 million dollar loan provided to Bombardier Inc. in 2008 and the 373 million dollars loaned to Bombardier Inc. in 2017, taking particular account of, but not limited to, the overall value of such investment on behalf of Canadians; and”; and
(c)by replacing the words “June 7” by the words “December 31”.—(Honourable Senator Forest)
No. 206. (one)
June 1, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Mercer, seconded by the Honourable Senator Fraser:
That a Special Committee on the Charitable Sector be appointed to examine the impact of federal and provincial laws and policies governing charities, nonprofit organizations, foundations, and other similar groups; and to examine the impact of the voluntary sector in Canada;
That the committee be composed of eight members, to be nominated by the Committee of Selection, and that four members constitute a quorum;
That the committee have the power to send for persons, papers and records; to examine witnesses; and to publish such papers and evidence from day to day as may be ordered by the committee;
That, notwithstanding rule 12-18(2)(b)(i), the committee have the power to sit from Monday to Friday, even though the Senate may then be adjourned for a period exceeding one week; and
That the committee be empowered to report from time to time and to submit its final report no later than September 28, 2018, and retain all powers necessary to publicize its findings until 60 days after the tabling of the final report.—(Honourable Senator Omidvar)
Inquiries
No. 1. (thirteen)
December 10, 2015—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Chaput, calling the attention of the Senate to the Program to Support Linguistic Rights, the importance of ensuring public financing of court actions that seek to create a fair and just society and to the urgent need for the federal government to re-establish the Court Challenges Program.—(Honourable Senator Joyal, P.C.)
No. 2. (ten)
March 9, 2016—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Jaffer, calling the attention of the Senate to the human rights implications of climate change, and how it will affect the most vulnerable in Canada and the world by threatening their right to food, water, health, adequate shelter, life, and self-determination.—(Honourable Senator Cordy)
No. 8. (four)
May 5, 2016—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Bellemare, calling the attention of the Senate to the Senate’s legislative work from the 24th to the 41st Parliament and on elements of evaluation.—(Honourable Senator Andreychuk)
No. 11. (nine)
June 20, 2016—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Tardif, calling the attention of the Senate to the Trans Canada Trail — its history, benefits and the challenges it is faced with as it approaches its 25th anniversary.—(Honourable Senator Day)
No. 12. (five)
May 18, 2016—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Seidman, calling the attention of the Senate to its role in the protection of regional and minority representation.—(Honourable Senator Martin)
No. 13. (thirteen)
October 25, 2016—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Bellemare, calling the attention of the Senate to the relevance of full employment in the 21st century in a Globalized economy.—(Honourable Senator Cormier)
No. 14.
November 29, 2016—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Hubley, calling the attention of the Senate to the current state of literacy and literacy programs on Prince Edward Island, including the need for federal support of the PEI Literacy Alliance.—(Honourable Senator Cordy)
No. 17. (fifteen)
December 13, 2016—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Meredith, calling the attention of the Senate to the Canadian Temporary Foreign Workers Program, including the living and working conditions of workers and their access to health care.—(Honourable Senator Jaffer)
No. 18. (eleven)
December 1, 2016—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Mockler, calling the attention of the Senate to the issue of pipeline safety in Canada, and the nation-building project that is the Energy East proposal, and its resulting impact on the Canadian economy.—(Honourable Senator Mercer)
No. 19. (five)
December 8, 2016—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Pate, calling the attention of the Senate to the circumstances of some of the most marginalized, victimized, criminalized and institutionalized in Canada, particularly the increasing over-representation of Indigenous women in Canadian prisons.—(Honourable Senator Boniface)
No. 20. (nine)
February 14, 2017—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Tardif, calling the attention of the Senate to regional universities and the important role they play in Canada.—(Honourable Senator Christmas)
No. 24.
May 16, 2017—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Wallin, calling the attention of the Senate to the proposal put forward by Senator Harder, titled “Sober Second Thinking”, which reviews the Senate’s performance since the appointment of independent senators, and recommends the creation of a Senate business committee.—(Honourable Senator Bellemare)
No. 25. (five)
May 11, 2017—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Maltais, calling the attention of the Senate to the softwood lumber crisis.—(Honourable Senator Mercer)
No. 26. (two)
May 30, 2017—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator McPhedran, calling the attention of the Senate to the important opportunity we have to review our principles and procedures with a view to ensuring that the Senate has the strongest most effective policies and mechanisms possible to respond to complaints against senators of sexual or other kinds of harassment.—(Honourable Senator Bernard)
Other
Nil
Notice Paper
Motions
No. 197. (twelve)
By the Honourable Senator Bellemare:
April 6, 2017—That the Standing Senate Committee on Banking, Trade and Commerce be authorized to examine and report on issues related to:
• determinants and trends in senior executive compensation in the largest publicly traded companies in Canada and around the world;
•existing measures or legislation implemented throughout the world on senior executive compensation and other potential and desirable measures and legislation; and
•any other matters deemed relevant on senior executive compensation;
That the committee submit its final report to the Senate no later than June 7, 2017, and that the committee retain all powers necessary to publicize its findings until 180 days after the tabling of the final report.
No. 215. (two)
By the Honourable Senator Dawson:
May 30, 2017—That the Senate take note of Agenda 2030 and the related sustainable development goals adopted by the United Nations on September 25, 2015, and encourage the Government of Canada to take account of them as it drafts legislation and develops policy relating to sustainable development.
No. 220.
By the Honourable Senator Lang:
June 6, 2017— That the Standing Senate Committee on National Security and Defence have the power to meet for the purposes of its study on Bill C-22, Act to establish the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians and to make consequential amendments to certain Acts, even though the Senate may then be sitting, and that rule 12-18(1) be suspended in relation thereto.
Inquiries
No. 21. (fourteen)
By the Honourable Senator Day:
March 30, 2017—That he will call the attention of the Senate to the career of the Honourable Senator Merchant.
No. 22. (thirteen)
By the Honourable Senator Sibbeston:
April 4, 2017—That he will call the attention of the Senate to the role of churches, particularly the need for recognition and acceptance of aboriginal practices and spirituality, in achieving reconciliation with the Indigenous peoples of Canada.
No. 23. (ten)
By the Honourable Senator Cordy:
April 13, 2017—That she will call the attention of the Senate to the importance of identifying palliative care as an insured health service covered under the Canada Health Act and to the importance of developing a national strategy for uniform standards and delivery of palliative care.
No. 27. (three)
By the Honourable Senator Cools:
May 18, 2017—That she will call the attention of the Senate to the January 30, 1923, Convention Concerning the Exchange of Greek and Turkish Populations agreed to by the Greek Government and the Grand National Assembly of Turkey, which Convention provided for the compulsory population exchange of Turkey’s Greek Christians for Greece’s Turkish Muslims, which population exchange caused monstrous anguish for those affected: and to the fact that this forced population exchange in Asia Minor was the brainchild of Greek Prime Minister Eleftherios Venizelos: and to Bruce Clark’s 2006 book Twice a Stranger that records Venizelos’ words on his paternity of the idea, at page 55:
The government should be aware that our moral standing in the civilized family of nations has been terribly diminished as a result of the arson and other acts of violence which the Greek army allowed itself to commit in Asia Minor, . . . . We urgently need, therefore, to regain the moral esteem of the world, and the compulsory population transfer must be carried out in such a way that this measure — which in itself is assuredly a barbaric one — will more readily be accepted as an action of last resort, carried out with the care and sympathy of a civilized people for the plight of those who face compulsory transfer. Faced with the protests that this measure will undoubtedly arouse in foreign countries, I am prepared publicly to acknowledge the ‘paternity’ of this idea, and to defend it. Whatever remains of the prestige I have enjoyed internationally will help to moderate the indignation.
(a)And to the Great War Allies 1919 Paris Peace Conference, and their 1919 Inter-Allied Commission of Enquiry into the Greek occupation of Smyrna and the surrounding districts, and this Commission’s review of the Greek Army’s invasion and occupation of Smyrna in Ottoman Anatolia, that year, on May 15, that lasted five years: and to the damning findings of this Commission of Enquiry Report on the Greek Army assaults: and
(b)To the Lausanne Peace Treaty between the Allies and the Government of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey, negotiated by Turkish General Ismet Inönü and Britain’s Foreign Secretary, Lord Curzon, whom, in 1922 Britain’s new and Canadian born Prime Minister, Andrew Bonar Law had dispatched to Lausanne, Switzerland to negotiate this Peace Treaty, that was signed on July 24, 1923: and
(c)To the British M.P. David Walder’s 1969 book The Chanak Affair, being the averted war at the Dardenelles seaport Chanak, between the Allies and the Turkish Grand National Assembly Forces: and to Walder’s words on the Greco-Turkish War at Smyrna and the Greek Army’s collapse, at page 170:
The morale of the Greek army had snapped completely. For too long it had been kept in position in Anatolia, badly supplied, apparently neglected by Athens, constantly harried by the enemy. When the Turks advanced the Greek army disintegrated as a fighting force. Soldiers refused to obey their officers, officers refused to obey their generals. The retreat became a rout. Reinforcements hastily sent to Smyrna refused to disembark. Discipline gone, the Greek army became a vengeful, frightened mob. On its way to the coast it vented its fury on Turkish civilians, killing and plundering, burning villages, and defiling mosques by slaughtering pigs, abhorrent to Moslems, within their precincts. Some units still preserved their discipline and managed therefore to put up some resistance to the Turks, but in the majority of cases panic supplanted reason, and the path to the sea was marked by a trail of abandoned artillery and ammunition and piles of discarded rifles and equipment. . . . . On September 3rd the Greeks, realising their position was hopeless, had called upon their former allies to use their influence to bring about an armistice. To no avail. It would have been a hopeless task in any event.
(d)And to the Treaty of Lausanne, which ended the Allied Forces occupation of Turkey that began on November 13, 1918, two days after the November 11 Armistice that ended the Great War’s hostilities, except with Turkey, which Lausanne Treaty brought the peace and was a great diplomatic achievement for the British and Turkish peoples: and this Treaty’s words:
The British Empire, France, Italy, Japan, Greece, Roumania and the Serb-Croat-Slovene State of the one part, and Turkey of the other part;
Being united in the desire to bring to a final close the state of war which has existed in the East since 1914,
Being anxious to re-establish the relations of friendship and commerce which are essential to the mutual well-being of their respective peoples,
And considering that these relations must be based on respect for the independence and sovereignty of States,
Have decided to conclude a Treaty for this purpose, . . .
(e)And to the Lausanne TreatyArticle 59 that noted the Greek Army’s belligerent acts in Turkey’s Anatolia, which were contrary to the laws of war, saying:
Greece recognizes her obligation to make reparation for the damage caused in Anatolia by the acts of the Greek Army or administration which were contrary to the laws of war. On the other hand, Turkey in consideration of the financial situation resulting from the prolongation of the war and from its consequences, finally renounces all claims for reparation against the Greek Government.
Written Questions
No. 26.
By the Honourable Senator Carignan, P.C.:
December 14, 2016—Regarding Governor in Council (GIC) Appointments:
1.Could the Government of Canada provide a list of all Governor in Council appointments for each province and territory from October 2015 to November 2016?
2.Could the Government of Canada provide the name of the appointee, the appointment received, and the length of the term?
No. 28.
By the Honourable Senator Carignan, P.C.:
December 14, 2016—Concerning the program Growing Forward 2 (GF2):
1.How much did the Government of Canada spend per year and per province under this program?
2.In which program sectors of activities was this money spent?
3.Does the government intend to renew this program when it expires?
No. 37.
By the Honourable Senator Downe:
January 31, 2017—In a statement published in the Ottawa Citizen on December 17, 2016 a spokesperson for the Minister of Veterans Affairs stated that “a position to lead the recruitment of veterans within the department has now been created and a veteran appointed to that job”.
Regarding this position:
1.Who has been appointed to fill this position?
2. What is this person’s military experience, including rank upon release from the Canadian Armed Forces?
3. When was this position created?
4. When was this position filled?
5. What is the salary range for this position?
6. Where is this position located?
No. 42.
By the Honourable Senator Downe:
March 8, 2017—With respect to advertising for the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) for the years 2015-17 inclusively:
(a)what was the advertising budget for the CRA, broken down by year;
(b)how many different advertising campaigns were created and/or used, broken down by year
(c)how many different advertisements were produced and/or used, broken down by year;
(d)what was the total cost (design, production, airtime, printing, etc.) for the advertising campaigns in (b);
(e)what was the total cost (production, airtime, printing, etc.) for the advertisements in (c);
(f)what was the cost to produce the television, radio, print, or online spots, broken down individually by advertisement;
(g)what company or companies produced the advertisements, broken down individually by advertisement;
(h)what was the cost of television airtime for the advertisements, broken down individually by advertisement;
(i)what television channels were the advertisements aired on;
(j)what was the cost of online airtime for the advertisements, broken down individually by advertisement;
(k)what online platforms were the advertisements aired on, broken down by free media (i.e. posting to YouTube) and fee media (i.e. online commercials);
(l)what was the cost of ad space in newspapers and other print publications, broken down individually by advertisement; and
(m)what programs or divisions of CRA were responsible for
(i)overseeing/coordinating production of the advertisements,
(ii)financing the production of the advertisements,
(iii)financing the purchase of airtime both on television and online, and print space in newspapers and other print publications?
No. 44.
By the Honourable Senator Downe:
March 8, 2017—Regarding the item “How Canada is cracking down on offshore tax evasion and aggressive tax avoidance,” published in the National Post on March 3, 2017:
For the period 2015-17:
1.Did the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) write the item in question?
2.If not, who wrote it, and what was the cost of having it written?
3.If it was prepared by Post Media, how many items of such content have been purchased by the CRA from Post Media?
4.Have any items of such content been purchased by the CRA from any other firm?
5.If so, how many and what are the names of those firms?
6.How much money has the CRA spent on such content?
7.In what newspapers was this content published? On what dates?
8.Have similar purchases of content been made in other media (radio, television, internet, etc.)?
9.If so, what are the details of those purchases (instances, dates, expenditures, firms, etc.)?
No. 45.
By the Honourable Senator Downe:
March 29, 2017—With respect to Veterans Affairs Canada:
Regarding the Veterans Priority Program Secretariat:
1. When was this organization formed?
2. Where is it located?
3. What is its budget?
4. Who are the members of the Secretariat?
No. 46.
By the Honourable Senator Downe:
March 29, 2017—With respect to the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA):
An article in the March 20th 2017 edition of the Toronto Star mentioned “a new branch of the CRA, known as the International, Large Business and Criminal Investigations”.
Regarding this “new branch”:
1. When was it formed?
2. Is it a wholly new organization, or is it merely a reorganization of existing resources?
3. What is its annual budget?
4. What is its mandate?
5. Has it been assigned any performance goals? If so, what are they?
6. How many people are employed in it, full time?
7. How many of these people are new hires, and how many came from other parts of the Agency?
No. 47.
By the Honourable Senator Downe:
April 4, 2017—With regard to Federal Public Service Employment:
For the period October 19th 2015 to March 31st 2017:
How many people worked for the Public Service of Canada (as defined by the Public Service Employment Act), by department, per geographical area for each of the months in the period specified?
No. 48.
By the Honourable Senator Downe:
April 4, 2017—With respect to the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA):
Regarding the April 11, 2016 announcement by the CRA of measures to combat overseas tax evasion:
1.The announcement referred to an investment of $444.4 million over five years.
•How much of that has actually been spent by the Agency as of the end of Fiscal Year 2016-17?
2.The Isle of Man was slated to be the first in a new series of in-depth examinations of potential tax havens. As of March 31, 2017:
• What have been the results, in terms of charges/convictions and revenue recovered?
•What additional jurisdictions have been added?
•How much money was identified as being owed?
•And how much was actually collected?
3.The CRA committed to creating a special program dedicated to stopping organizations that perform and promote tax evasion and aggressive tax avoidance. As of March 31, 2017:
•Has this special program been created?
•What resources have been spent on it?
•How does the number of tax schemes examined compare to one year ago?
•Has it resulted in more criminal investigations? If so, how many?
•How many charges have been laid as a direct result of this effort?
4.The Agency announced a five-fold increase in the number of investigations of so-called “high risk taxpayers” — from 600 to 3000 annually — which would bring in $423 million in new revenue. As of March 31, 2017:
•How many examinations have been conducted?
•How much new tax revenue has been collected?
5.CRA announced the hiring of 100 new auditors to investigate “high-risk multinational corporations” which the CRA was said to bring in half a billion dollars in five years. As of March 31, 2017:
•How many examinations have been conducted?
•How much new tax revenue has been collected?
•How many auditors are currently employed to investigate “high-risk multinational corporations”?
•How does this compare to the 440 full-time equivalents (FTEs) in the international Audit Program and the 506 FTEs working in the Aggressive Tax Planning Program in Fiscal Year 2009-10?
6.The Agency announced the formation of an Offshore Compliance Advisory Committee which, among other things, would lay out a course for the government to finally measure this country’s tax gap. As of March 31, 2017:
•How many times has it met?
•Who has attended these meetings?
•When will the committee issue further reports?
•What recommendations have been made?
No. 49.
By the Honourable Senator Mercer:
April 6, 2017—For the period 2012-17, what are the details (including copies of records) of any travel members of the Tax Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Canada, and the Federal Court of Appeal of Canada (other than travel related to trials), made for the last five years, including:
1.Dates of travel;
2.Purpose of travel;
3.Name of anyone accompanying them;
4.Cost of travel, accommodations, dinners, receptions, concerts, etc.;
5.Whether that cost was paid for by the Government of Canada, or by the courts; and
6.The name of any organization or individual sponsoring any travel, accommodations, dinners, receptions, concerts, etc. for any of these judges.
Tax Court
The Chief Justice
The Honourable Eugene P. Rossiter
Associate Chief Justice
The Honourable Lucie Lamarre
Judges (*Supernumerary)
The Honourable Pierre Archambault*
The Honourable Alain Tardif*
The Honourable Diane Campbell*
The Honourable Campbell J. Miller*
The Honourable Brent Paris
The Honourable Réal Favreau
The Honourable Gaston Jorré
The Honourable Patrick J. Boyle
The Honourable Valerie Miller
The Honourable Robert J. Hogan
The Honourable Steven K. D’Arcy
The Honourable Frank J. Pizzitelli
The Honourable Johanne D’Auray
The Honourable Randall S. Bocock
The Honourable David E. Graham
The Honourable Kathleen T. Lyons
The Honourable John R. Owen
The Honourable Dominique Lafleur
The Honourable Sylvain Ouimet
The Honourable Don R. Sommerfeldt
The Honourable Henry A. Visser
The Honourable Guy R. Smith
The Honourable Bruce Russell
Federal Court of Canada
The Chief Justice
The Honourable Paul Crampton
Judges (*Supernumerary)
The Honourable Sandra J. Simpson *
The Honourable Danièle Tremblay-Lamer *
The Honourable Douglas R. Campbell *
The Honourable Elizabeth Heneghan
The Honourable Luc Martineau
The Honourable Simon Noël
The Honourable James Russell
The Honourable James O’Reilly
The Honourable Sean J. Harrington *
The Honourable Richard Mosley
The Honourable Michel M.J. Shore
The Honourable Michael L. Phelan
The Honourable Anne L. Mactavish
The Honourable Robert L. Barnes
The Honourable Leonard S. Mandamin
The Honourable Russel W. Zinn
The Honourable Jocelyne Gagné
The Honourable Catherine M. Kane
The Honourable Michael D. Manson
The Honourable Yvan Roy
The Honourable Cecily Y. Strickland
The Honourable Peter B. Annis
The Honourable Glennys L. McVeigh
The Honourable René LeBlanc
The Honourable Martine St-Louis
The Honourable George R. Locke
The Honourable Henry S. Brown
The Honourable Alan Diner
The Honourable Keith M. Boswell
The Honourable Simon Fothergill
The Honourable B. Richard Bell
The Honourable Denis Gascon
The Honourable Richard F. Southcott
The Honourable Patrick K. Gleeson
The Honourable Robin Camp
The Honourable E. Susan Elliott
The Honourable Sylvie E. Roussel
The Honourable Ann Marie McDonald
Federal Court of Appeal
Chief Justice
The Honourable Marc Noël
Judges (*Supernumerary)
The Honourable Marc Nadon *
The Honourable J.D. Denis Pelletier *
The Honourable Eleanor R. Dawson *
The Honourable Johanne Gauthier
The Honourable Johanne Trudel *
The Honourable David W. Stratas
The Honourable Wyman W. Webb
The Honourable David G. Near
The Honourable André F.J. Scott
The Honourable Richard Boivin
The Honourable Donald J. Rennie
The Honourable Yves de Montigny
The Honourable Mary J.L. Gleason
The Honourable Judith M. Woods
No. 50.
By the Honourable Senator Downe:
April 11, 2017—With respect to Veterans Affairs Canada (VAC):
In his response tabled on September 29, 2016 to my Written Question, the Minister for Veterans Affairs indicated that 19 of the 61 senior management positions in VAC are not located at VAC National Headquarters in Charlottetown Prince Edward Island. This led to my Order Paper Question No. 19, of October 25, 2016, in which I requested details about those 19 senior managers; in particular their names, position titles, salary ranges and the number of actual days since their respective appointments that they worked in Ottawa and how many days they worked at the National Headquarters in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island. In the response to this Question, Tabled on April 5, 2016, I received information about these senior officials, but there was no information pertaining to Walt Natynczyk, Deputy Minister.
Therefore, regarding Walt Natynczyk, Deputy Minister of Veterans Affairs Canada:
1.What is the salary range for his position?
2.Please provide a detailed list of the actual days that he worked in Ottawa and how many days he worked at the National Headquarters in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island since his appointment.
No. 51.
By the Honourable Senator Kenny:
April 13, 2017—1.How much funding from the Federal Government has the Halifax Security Forum received for each of the past five years?
2.What was the total dollar amount and the percentage of the Halifax Security Forum annual budget that was directed towards members of the US Senate and US House of Representatives in each of the past five years?
3.What are the names of the Halifax Security Forum participants from the US Senate and the US House of Representatives for each of the past five years?
4.How much of the Halifax Security Forum budget in each of the past five years was spent on accommodation, food and transportation for members of the US Senate and US House of Representatives?
5.Who else has had their food, accommodation and travel paid for by the Halifax Security Forum in each of the past five years?
No. 52.
By the Honourable Senator Pate:
May 11, 2017—With respect to Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act:
Under the current provisions of the Citizenship Act, minors are only eligible to apply for citizenship if a parent is also applying to become a citizen or is already a citizen; therefore, children are currently reliant on their parents or guardians to complete their applications for citizenship. Yet, there are children, who through no fault of their own, end up in the care of the state, creating a situation that can often result in them being made more vulnerable and marginalized. These vulnerable children therefore become reliant on the state to act in the role of parent or guardian.
1. What measures are being taken by the Government of Canada to ensure that minors in Canada — those most vulnerable children who find themselves in the care of the state — are not further disadvantaged with respect to the lack of processing of their citizenship applications?
2. Has the Government of Canada considered imposing a duty on state ministries and agencies serving as guardians of minors to not only inform these minors if they are not Canadian citizens — but to also impose a duty to apply for citizenship for minors in the care of the state as a facet of the fiduciary duty of child welfare authorities to serve the best interests of children who are wards of the state?