Skip to content

Strengthening Canada’s Autonomous Sanctions Architecture: Five-Year Legislative Review of the Sergei Magnitsky Law and the Special Economic Measures Act

Canada has greatly increased its use of economic sanctions to punish bad actors, but the effectiveness of these tools remains difficult to evaluate.

Recommendations

RECOMMENDATION 1

The Government of Canada should work with its allies to establish a formal mechanism for the coordination and implementation of autonomous sanctions and for the sharing of best practices on how to maximize sanctions effectiveness.


RECOMMENDATION 2

The Government of Canada should seek to be consistent in its global application of autonomous sanctions imposed in response to human rights violations.


RECOMMENDATION 3

The Government of Canada should provide clear policy guidance surrounding its authority to use the Special Economic Measures Act and the Justice for Victims of Corrupt Foreign Officials Act (Sergei Magnitsky Law), including by articulating the circumstances in which either Act may be used and the rationale for using one Act over the other.


RECOMMENDATION 4

The Government of Canada should specifically outline the objectives associated with a given sanctions regime and clearly communicate those objectives to the public.


RECOMMENDATION 5

The Government of Canada should work with its allies, civil society and the academic and research community to develop methodology to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of Canadian sanctions, including their effects and any consequences of an unintended nature.


RECOMMENDATION 6

The Government of Canada should regularly review the humanitarian exceptions in Canadian sanctions regulations to ensure that the public has clarity and guidance in relation to the delivery of humanitarian assistance in a state targeted by Canadian sanctions.


RECOMMENDATION 7

As part of establishing a specialized sanctions bureau, the Government of Canada should ensure that the officials involved in administering Canada’s sanctions receive training on the specifics of Canada’s sanctions regimes.


RECOMMENDATION 8

As part of establishing the specialized sanctions bureau, the Government of Canada should expand interdepartmental coordination on sanctions so that all relevant departments and agencies, including the Canadian Security Intelligence Service and the Communications Security Establishment, can contribute to identifying individuals and entities that could be subject to autonomous sanctions by Canada.


RECOMMENDATION 9

The Government of Canada should invest greater financial and human resources in enforcing sanctions by providing new funding specifically for this purpose to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and the Canada Border Services Agency.


RECOMMENDATION 10

The Government of Canada should provide more detailed identifying information on sanctioned individuals and entities in the regulations made pursuant to the Special Economic Measures Act and the Justice for Victims of Corrupt Foreign Officials Act (Sergei Magnitsky Law). The government should also include detailed identifying information in the Consolidated Canadian Autonomous Sanctions List, along with the justifications for listing individuals and entities.

RECOMMENDATION 11

The Government of Canada should evaluate the feasibility, advantages and disadvantages of having the consolidated list include individuals sanctioned under the United Nations Act, the Freezing Assets of Corrupt Foreign Officials Act and the terrorist entity provisions of the Criminal Code.


RECOMMENDATION 12

The Government of Canada should amend the Special Economic Measures Act and the Justice for Victims of Corrupt Foreign Officials Act (Sergei Magnitsky Law) to require the government to table in Parliament a detailed annual report on the implementation of Canada’s sanctions regimes. This report could include information on the impact and effectiveness of Canada’s sanctions regimes and the value of frozen assets and blocked transactions under each sanctions regime.


RECOMMENDATION 13

The Government of Canada should make it a priority to develop and provide the public and the private sector with specific and comprehensive written guidance on the interpretation of Canada’s autonomous sanctions laws and regulations. This guidance should be updated in a regular and timely manner to reflect new regulations made under Canada’s sanctions regimes.


RECOMMENDATION 14

The Government of Canada should evaluate how it could use its existing authority to grant general permits under the Special Economic Measures Act and the Justice for Victims of Corrupt Foreign Officials Act (Sergei Magnitsky Law).


RECOMMENDATION 15

The Government of Canada should establish an effective, transparent process to review applications for delisting with specific service standards. The Government of Canada should also inform individuals and entities subject to autonomous sanctions of the action taken against them, along with an explanation as to why they have been sanctioned and how to submit an application for delisting.


RECOMMENDATION 16

The Government of Canada should establish specific service standards for the processing of permit applications sought in relation to the Special Economic Measures Act and the Justice for Victims of Corrupt Foreign Officials Act (Sergei Magnitsky Law).


RECOMMENDATION 17

The Government of Canada should engage with its allies, including as part of the Russian Elites, Proxies and Oligarchs Task Force, to share best practices regarding the forfeiture and repurposing of sanctioned assets.


RECOMMENDATION 18

The Government of Canada should amend the Special Economic Measures Act and the Justice for Victims of Corrupt Foreign Officials Act (Sergei Magnitsky Law) to require that committees of the Senate and the House of Commons conduct a comprehensive review of the two Acts every 10 years.


RECOMMENDATION 19

The Government of Canada should amend the Special Economic Measures Act and the Justice for Victims of Corrupt Foreign Officials Act (Sergei Magnitsky Law) to require that new regulations made under either Act include a sunset clause that would prescribe a date for the termination of a sanctions regime unless renewed prior to the expiry of the term.

News release

Ottawa – Canada has greatly increased its use of economic sanctions to punish bad actors, but the effectiveness of these tools remains difficult to evaluate, a Senate committee said in a report released Tuesday, May 16, 2023.

The Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade has been studying the Justice for Victims of Corrupt Foreign Officials Act (Sergei Magnitsky Law) and the Special Economic Measures Act, Canada’s two core pieces of autonomous sanctions legislation. Autonomous sanctions can be applied in the absence of a United Nations Security Council resolution; they allow Canada to impose restrictive measures on individuals, entities and foreign states based on Canada’s foreign policy considerations and when qualifying criteria set out in the legislation are met.

Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Canada has imposed sanctions on more than 1,600 individuals and entities from Russia, Ukraine and Belarus; Canada has also imposed wide bans on the provision of goods and services to Russia.

The committee heard that many variables influence the effectiveness of sanctions, including the degree of economic interdependence with the target country and whether the international community is taking similar actions. Witnesses noted, for example, that international sanctions against apartheid South Africa bore fruit, but that sanctions against North Korea have been less successful. Moreover, sanctions can disproportionately affect the least well off in the target country while entrenching authoritarianism and corruption.

Witnesses said Canada would benefit from better tools to assess the impact and effectiveness of its sanctions, including any unintended consequences; among the report’s 18 recommendations is a call for the federal government to develop methodology to accomplish this.

Quick Facts

Quotes

“Autonomous sanctions have become a preferred diplomatic course of action to address international crises. As Canada increases its use of this tool, it is crucial for Canadians to have a greater understanding of the effectiveness of our sanctions legislation, particularly to ensure that vulnerable people do not become collateral damage.”

- Senator Peter M. Boehm, Chair of the committee

“Targeted sanctions on those who trample on human rights and turn their backs on peace sends a clear message about our values. Given the tragedy unfolding in Ukraine, it is especially appropriate to review Canada’s sanctions regime. We urge the federal government to heed our recommendations to strengthen these measures.” 

- Senator Peter Harder, Deputy Chair of the committee

“We have heard that sanctions are most effective when the international community acts in concert. If Canada wants to show leadership on security and human rights issues, we must work closely with our allies to ensure the actions we take are more than just symbolic.”

- Senator Michael L. MacDonald, member of the Subcommittee on Agenda and Procedure

“It is clear that more information is needed about the effectiveness of the Magnitsky Law and the Special Economic Measures Act. Gross violators of human rights and international norms deserve to be sanctioned, but we must also understand the consequences of our actions.”

- Senator Stephen Greene, member of the Subcommittee on Agenda and Procedure

 

Associated Links

 

For more information:
Amely Coulombe
Communications Officer | Senate of Canada
343-575-7553 | amely.coulombe@sen.parl.gc.ca

Senators who participated in this study

Peter M. Boehm

Peter M. Boehm
ISG - Ontario

Peter Harder, P.C.

Peter Harder, P.C.
PSG - Ontario

Gwen Boniface

Gwen Boniface
ISG - Ontario

Mary Coyle

Mary Coyle
ISG - Nova Scotia (Antigonish)

Marty Deacon

Marty Deacon
ISG - Ontario (Waterloo Region)

Amina Gerba

Amina Gerba
PSG - Quebec (Rigaud)

Stephen Greene

Stephen Greene
CSG - Nova Scotia (Halifax - The Citadel)

Leo Housakos

Leo Housakos
C - Quebec (Wellington)

Mohamed-Iqbal Ravalia

Mohamed-Iqbal Ravalia
ISG - Newfoundland and Labrador

Michael L. MacDonald

Michael L. MacDonald
C - Nova Scotia (Cape Breton)

David Richards

David Richards
C - New Brunswick

Yuen Pau Woo

Yuen Pau Woo
ISG - British Columbia

Ex-officio members of the committee: The Honourable Senator Marc Gold, P.C., or Raymonde Gagné, the Honourable Senator Donald Plett or Yonah Martin


Other Senators who have participated in the study: Senator Diane Bellemare, Senator Margaret Dawn Anderson, Senator Bev Busson, Senator Tony Loffreda, Senator Paula Simons and Senator Julie Miville-Dechêne

Government Response

Back to top