Skip to content

Fuelled by Technology, Powered by Humanity: An interim report on a human-centred approach to AI in Canada

AI is already reshaping how Canadians work, learn and live — but is Canada ready for what comes next? In its interim report, the Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology calls for federal leadership to prepare the labour market for potential disruption. The report urges a human-centred approach to AI that protects people while supporting innovation.

Executive Summary

Canada has been seen as a leader in artificial intelligence (AI) research and development – home to the “godfathers of AI,” Professors Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio; and the first country in the world to launch a national AI strategy in 2017. However, domestic adoption and governance of these emerging technologies have not kept pace with early successes.

In 2025, Canada ranked among the lowest of 47 countries surveyed by KPMG and the University of Melbourne, when it comes to the regular use of, and trust in AI.[1] Just over one third of Canadians (34%) were “willing to trust AI.”[2] This echoes what the committee heard during its study: trust in AI technologies is very low, and is one of the most significant barriers to more widespread, safe adoption in Canada.

In many ways, low trust is an expression of concern. As AI technologies continue to evolve, they are being embedded throughout governments, businesses, and society; producing increasingly visible, systemic, and inequitable social impacts. Hesitation as a reaction to new technologies is not a new phenomenon and it is not uncommon with new technologies that there are more questions than answers. It is expected that a technology that expressly aims to mimic, if not surpass human intelligence, provokes a strong response. Given that we are more likely to question what we do not understand and control, information gathering and knowledge sharing is an exercise of trust building in and of itself.

It was in this context that the Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology (the committee) began a study on the impact of AI in Canada, holding six meetings so far in 2026. Throughout the planning, evidence gathering, and reporting for this first phase of the study, which ended on May 8, 2026, the committee has been very aware of the rapidly evolving nature of this technology and has remained focused on sharing the information and recommendations it has heard while they remain relevant.

On June 4, 2026, the Government of Canada announced a renewed national AI strategy, AI for All. While the development of that strategy was distinct from this study, the committee is encouraged that many of the observations and key actions mentioned in the renewed strategy align with those made in this report, with particular attention to the emphasis on Canadian identity and values; the commitment to create AI-related jobs; the identification of priority sectors for AI opportunity; and the commitment to collaborate with multinational partners towards safe AI internationally.[3] That said, the committee looks forward to learning more about how certain commitments such as legislation preventing online harms and protecting Canadians’ data, AI literacy beyond the student and youth population, and the creation of anticipated job opportunities, will be implemented and the results measured.

On June 10, 2026, the Minister of Canadian Identity and Culture introduced Bill C-34, the Safe Social Media Act.[4] Among other things, this bill would enact a Digital Safety Act regulating interactions with certain online services, including by introducing age-related restrictions for persons under 16 accessing social media services; and new responsibilities for chatbot services. Like with the renewed national AI strategy, the committee is encouraged that the provisions proposed in this bill largely align with recommendations made in this report. However, members note that given the possibility of amendments during the legislative process, it is challenging to provide further commentary at this time. The committee hopes to be able to use the knowledge learned during this and future phases of this study to inform a more in-depth examination of Bill C-34.

This interim report aims to establish what AI is, the major opportunities, risks and challenges it introduces, and to provide recommendations to the federal government as it implements a renewed national AI strategy. The preliminary observations and recommendations in this report reflect the degree and spectrum of fears associated with new technologies, with the balance weighted towards “risks and challenges.” In future phases of this study, the committee hopes to hear more about positive “opportunities” to promote the development of AI technologies for good, for all. Other issues raised as priorities for future phases of this committee’s work include collaborative action and emergency planning to mitigate the threat of superintelligence; the impact of AI on the labour market and work in Canada; and the continued focus on the use and impact of AI technologies on at-risk and marginalized populations.

When it comes to AI, it is no longer a question of “if” or “when.” AI is here. It is being integrated throughout Canadian society. However, there is a still an opportunity to respond to and influence the questions of “how,” “why,” and “for whom” AI technologies are developed and deployed. 


[1] “Figure 2: Regular use of AI systems across countries,” and “Figure 9: Perceptions of the trustworthiness of AI systems,” in KPMG and University of Melbourne, Trust, attitudes and use of artificial intelligence: A global study 2025.

[2] KPMG and University of Melbourne, Trust, attitudes and use of artificial intelligence: A global study 2025 – Canada insights.

[3] Government of Canada, Canada’s National Artificial Intelligence Strategy: AI for All.

[4] Bill C-34, An Act to enact the Digital Safety Act and the Digital Safety Commission of Canada and to make consequential amendments to other Acts (Safe Social Media Act), 45th Parliament, 1st Session, (first reading version, June 10, 2026).

Recommendations

Recommendation 1: Develop a National AI Literacy Strategy

That the Government of Canada, in collaboration with provincial, territorial, and Indigenous governments, implement a national strategy for AI literacy and education that:

  • provides a comprehensive definition of AI, as used and understood by the Government of Canada;
  • responds to the needs of diverse communities, including Indigenous Peoples, elderly persons, other members of equity-deserving groups, and sectors at higher-risk of AI-related job displacement;
  • ensures persons across all regions of Canada have adequate Internet connectivity to support access to AI technologies;
  • is adaptable to the evolving spectrum of AI technologies; and
  • is adequately supported by practical tools and resources that reach individuals at their level of knowledge and need.

Recommendation 2: Close the Research to Adoption Gap

That the Government of Canada close the research and development to integration and adoption gap by continuing to invest in sovereign compute capacity and infrastructure; supporting public sector deployment; and fostering adoption among individuals and industry in Canada through training and skills development.


Recommendation 3: Leverage AI to Increase Inclusion and Access

That the Government of Canada leverage AI technologies to mitigate bias; remove barriers to access; and improve accessibility and inclusion, by:

  • engaging with members of diverse communities, equity-deserving groups, and rights holders to better understand the potential social impact of AI technologies;
  • supporting research into human-centred, inclusive AI; and
  • identifying proactive and preventive mechanisms the federal government can target for support.

Recommendation 4: Proactive Labour Market Preparedness

That the Government of Canada leverage AI technologies to mitigate bias; remove barriers to access; and improve accessibility and inclusion, by:

  • engaging with members of diverse communities, equity-deserving groups, and rights holders to better understand the potential social impact of AI technologies;
  • supporting research into human-centred, inclusive AI; and
  • identifying proactive and preventive mechanisms the federal government can target for support.

Recommendation 5: Implement Comprehensive Legal AI Framework

That the Government of Canada urgently develop and implement a comprehensive legal framework regulating AI that:

  • incorporates and modernizes existing legislation, like the Privacy Act, Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, and Access to Information Act, where relevant;
  • complements existing models of standardization, risk mitigation, impact assessment, and data governance;
  • is built on ongoing consultation and engagement with stakeholders representing diverse perspectives and rights;
  • is guided by the precautionary principle;
  • establishes a rigorous, risk-based, pre-deployment testing and regulatory enforcement regime;
  • establishes an independent, arms-length regulatory authority to implement and enforce this framework; and
  • prioritizes a flexible, agile approach with the capacity to quickly respond to new innovations and AI technologies.

Recommendation 6: Protect and Enforce Data Governance and Sovereignty Principles

That the Government of Canada urgently prioritize the protection of data privacy and sovereignty within Canada, with particular consideration to:

  • developing a better understanding of Canadian sovereignty gaps and limitations throughout the AI stack;
  • Indigenous Peoples’ rights to data sovereignty and self-determination; and
  • regulatory mechanisms that will support Canada’s expression of AI and data sovereignty.

Recommendation 7: Promote Human-Centred AI

That the Government of Canada leverage effective AI governance to promote the domestic development and adoption of human-centred AI that is inspired by Canadian values, like diversity, democracy, freedom, human rights, and bilingualism, and that respects Indigenous rights and worldviews.

News release

Ottawa – The federal government should take the lead in preparing Canada’s labour market for disruptions relating to the rise of artificial intelligence (AI), the Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology said in an interim report released Thursday, June 18, 2026.

AI is already being integrated throughout Canadian society but the long-term effects remain to be seen, including in the labour sector, where there is a risk that AI could lead to mass unemployment. In its interim report, Fuelled by Technology, Powered by Humanity: An interim report on a human-centred approach to AI in Canada, the committee recommends that the federal government play a leadership role in co-ordinating with provincial and territorial governments and other partners to prepare the labour market for this potential disruption by supporting initiatives such as workforce transition and adaptation programming.

The committee’s interim report broadly aims to establish the major opportunities, risks and challenges AI introduces and to provide recommendations to the government as it implements its national AI strategy. The report acknowledges the concern and hesitation associated with this new technology; the committee hopes to hear more about positive opportunities for AI as it continues its study.

AI can neither be unquestioningly embraced, nor uncritically dismissed. Policy makers have difficult decisions to make to ensure that the rise of AI does not come at the expense of human beings. The committee urges the federal government to ensure that human needs and values are centralized in decision making for a future that may be fuelled by technology, but that is powered by humanity.

Quick Facts

  • The interim report makes seven recommendations as to how Canada can responsibly and effectively adopt AI technology, including that the federal government work with provincial, territorial and Indigenous governments to implement a national strategy for AI literacy and education.
  • Appropriate domestic governance and regulation can encourage the development of sovereign, human-centred AI that respects Indigenous rights and knowledge, and Canadian values like democracy, freedom and human rights. However, the novel and dynamic nature of AI also makes it difficult to adequately assess its impact, especially on developing youth.
  • On June 4, 2026, the federal government announced a renewed national AI strategy, AI for All. While the development of that strategy was distinct from this study, the committee is encouraged that many of the observations and key actions in the strategy align with the committee’s report.

Quotes

“It remains to be seen whether artificial intelligence will count among humanity’s greatest triumphs or greatest follies. Canada can and must do its part to shape AI into a tool for good. We look forward to continuing our investigation into how this should be done, and to sharing our findings.”

- Senator Rosemary Moodie, chair of the committee

“We stand at the precipice. If superhuman AI emerges, humanity likely faces complex existential threats — and the more optimistic scenarios portend sweeping socio-economic changes not seen since the Second Industrial Revolution. Over the next few years, the path we chart as Canadians will have profound consequences for generations to come.”

- Senator Sharon Burey, deputy chair of the committee

“We know that AI is moving faster than any technology we’ve ever seen — in three-month cycles. And through every conversation that informed this interim report, one theme kept rising to the top: trust. Trust is the anchor. It’s what drives adoption, builds literacy and protects our sovereignty. We have to build toward it deliberately — because without it, none of the rest holds.”

- Senator Katherine Hay, member of the Subcommittee on Agenda and Procedure

“The federal government must consider the effect of AI adoption on the labour force. Its arrival creates a risk of mass unemployment in certain sectors, which could in turn destabilize the tax base and threaten the social safety net.”

- Senator Yonah Martin, member of the Subcommittee on Agenda and Procedure

Associated Links

For more information:

Monica Granados
Communications Officer | Senate of Canada
343-550-5448 | monica.granados@sen.parl.gc.ca

Senators who participated in this study

Rosemary Moodie

Rosemary Moodie
ISG - Ontario

Sharon Burey

Sharon Burey
CSG - Ontario

Dawn Arnold

Dawn Arnold
ISG - New Brunswick

Victor Boudreau

Victor Boudreau
ISG - New Brunswick

Rodger Cuzner

Rodger Cuzner
PSG - Nova Scotia

Margo Greenwood

Margo Greenwood
ISG - British Columbia

Katherine Hay

Katherine Hay
PSG - Ontario

Yonah Martin

Yonah Martin
C - British Columbia

Marilou McPhedran

Marilou McPhedran
Non-affiliated - Manitoba

Tracy Muggli

Tracy Muggli
PSG - Saskatchewan

Flordeliz (Gigi) Osler

Flordeliz (Gigi) Osler
CSG - Manitoba

Chantal Petitclerc

Chantal Petitclerc
ISG - Quebec (Grandville)

Paulette Senior

Paulette Senior
ISG - Ontario

Ex officio members of the committee: the Honourable Pierre Moreau, P.C., or the Honourable Patti LaBoucane-Benson, the Honourable Leo Housakos or the Honourable Yonah Martin, the Honourable Lucie Moncion or the Honourable Joan Kingston, the Honourable Flordeliz (Gigi) Osler or the Honourable Robert Black, the Honourable Brian Francis or the Honourable Judy A. White

Other senators who have participated in the study: the Honourable Yuen Pau Woo and the Honourable Andrew Cardozo

Back to top